Hi Ezequiel,
Thanks for reviewing the series.
On 06/09/2015 21:37, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 27 Jul 02:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> If nand_wait_ready() times out, this is silently ignored, and its
>> caller will then proceed to read from/write to the chip before it is
>> ready. This can
Hi Ezequiel,
Thanks for reviewing the series.
On 06/09/2015 21:37, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 27 Jul 02:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> If nand_wait_ready() times out, this is silently ignored, and its
>> caller will then proceed to read from/write to the chip before it is
>> ready. This can
On 27 Jul 02:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> If nand_wait_ready() times out, this is silently ignored, and its
> caller will then proceed to read from/write to the chip before it is
> ready. This can potentially result in corruption with no indication as
> to why.
>
> While a 20ms timeout seems like
On 27 Jul 02:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> If nand_wait_ready() times out, this is silently ignored, and its
> caller will then proceed to read from/write to the chip before it is
> ready. This can potentially result in corruption with no indication as
> to why.
>
> While a 20ms timeout seems like
If nand_wait_ready() times out, this is silently ignored, and its
caller will then proceed to read from/write to the chip before it is
ready. This can potentially result in corruption with no indication as
to why.
While a 20ms timeout seems like it should be plenty enough, certain
behaviour can
If nand_wait_ready() times out, this is silently ignored, and its
caller will then proceed to read from/write to the chip before it is
ready. This can potentially result in corruption with no indication as
to why.
While a 20ms timeout seems like it should be plenty enough, certain
behaviour can
6 matches
Mail list logo