On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 11:16 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> As far as I can tell, there is basically nothing correct about this
> code. It misinterprets npss (off-by-one). It hardcodes a bunch of
> power states, which is nonsense, because they're all just indices
> into a table that software
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 11:16 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> As far as I can tell, there is basically nothing correct about this
> code. It misinterprets npss (off-by-one). It hardcodes a bunch of
> power states, which is nonsense, because they're all just indices
> into a table that software
As far as I can tell, there is basically nothing correct about this
code. It misinterprets npss (off-by-one). It hardcodes a bunch of
power states, which is nonsense, because they're all just indices
into a table that software needs to parse. It completely ignores
the distinction between
As far as I can tell, there is basically nothing correct about this
code. It misinterprets npss (off-by-one). It hardcodes a bunch of
power states, which is nonsense, because they're all just indices
into a table that software needs to parse. It completely ignores
the distinction between
4 matches
Mail list logo
