On 10/15/2013 05:45 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:53 PM, David Cohen wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
+#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
+static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
+
On 10/15/2013 04:53 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>> +#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
>>> +static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
>>> +
On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
+#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
+ static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
+ __attribute__((__section__(".x86_intel_mid_dev.init"))) =
+
Any reason
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>
> +#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
> + static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
> + __attribute__((__section__(".x86_intel_mid_dev.init"))) =
> +
Any reason to not just call this "sfi_device()" or
As Intel rolling out more SoC's after Moorestown, we need to
re-structure the code in a way that is backward compatible and easy to
expand. This patch implements a flexible way to support multiple boards
and devices.
This patch does not add any new functional support. It just refactors
the
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
+#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
+ static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
+ __attribute__((__section__(.x86_intel_mid_dev.init))) = i
+
Any reason to not just call this sfi_device() or something
On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
+#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
+ static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
+ __attribute__((__section__(.x86_intel_mid_dev.init))) = i
+
Any reason to
On 10/15/2013 04:53 PM, David Cohen wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
+#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
+static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
+
On 10/15/2013 05:45 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:53 PM, David Cohen wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
+#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
+static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
+
As Intel rolling out more SoC's after Moorestown, we need to
re-structure the code in a way that is backward compatible and easy to
expand. This patch implements a flexible way to support multiple boards
and devices.
This patch does not add any new functional support. It just refactors
the
10 matches
Mail list logo