On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:20:03AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:04:40AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Conversely, if the panel isn't capable of generating an HPD signal, then
> > I don't think it would be appropriate to make it a DT property. It would
> > b
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 04:20:39PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> 在 09/05/2015 05:46 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
> >On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Yakir Yang wrote:
> >>Hi Rob,
> >>
> >>在 09/03/2015 04:17 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
> >>>On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Some edp
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 11:59:08AM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> 在 09/03/2015 05:04 PM, Thierry Reding 写道:
> >On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 12:27:47PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
> >>Hi Rob,
> >>
> >>在 09/03/2015 04:17 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
> >>>On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
Hi Rob,
在 09/05/2015 05:46 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Yakir Yang wrote:
Hi Rob,
在 09/03/2015 04:17 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
failed when hpd plug in detect
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> 在 09/03/2015 04:17 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
>>> failed when hpd plug in detect failed.
>>
>> This is a proper
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:04:40AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Conversely, if the panel isn't capable of generating an HPD signal, then
> I don't think it would be appropriate to make it a DT property. It would
> be better to hard-code it in the driver, lest someone forget to set the
> property
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 04:55:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:17:57PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Are there any eDP panels which don't have EDID and need panel details in
> >> DT?
> >
> > Most panel
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:17:57PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> [...]
>> Are there any eDP panels which don't have EDID and need panel details in DT?
>
> Most panels need information other than EDID. They typically have some
> requirements reg
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 12:27:47PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> 在 09/03/2015 04:17 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
> >On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
> >>Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
> >>failed when hpd plug in detect failed.
> >This is a propert
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:17:57PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
[...]
> Are there any eDP panels which don't have EDID and need panel details in DT?
Most panels need information other than EDID. They typically have some
requirements regarding the power up sequence that aren't to be found
anywhere in
Hi Rob,
在 09/03/2015 04:17 AM, Rob Herring 写道:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
failed when hpd plug in detect failed.
This is a property of the panel (or connector perhaps), so this
property should be located th
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
> failed when hpd plug in detect failed.
This is a property of the panel (or connector perhaps), so this
property should be located there. At least, it is a common issue and
not spe
Some edp screen do not have hpd signal, so we can't just return
failed when hpd plug in detect failed.
This is an hardware property, so we need add a devicetree property
"analogix,need-force-hpd" to indicate this sutiation.
Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang
---
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3:
- Add "
13 matches
Mail list logo