Hi Eugen,
> Wolfram, what do you think ?
Yes, the bindings should be generic. Peter's reasoning makes much sense
to me. I am quite sure if the two of you can work things out, I'll have
nothing to add.
Thanks,
Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2019-09-02 16:15, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
>
>
> On 02.09.2019 13:49, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> On 2019-09-02 12:12, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
>>> From: Eugen Hristev
>>>
>>> Some i2c controllers have a built-in digital or analog filter.
>>> This is specifically required
Eugen,
On 02/09/2019 14:15:14+, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 02.09.2019 13:49, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> > On 2019-09-02 12:12, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
> >> From: Eugen Hristev
> >>
> >> Some i2c controllers have a built-in digital or analog filter.
> >> This is
On 02.09.2019 13:49, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 12:12, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
>> From: Eugen Hristev
>>
>> Some i2c controllers have a built-in digital or analog filter.
>> This is specifically required depending on the hardware PCB/board.
>> Some controllers also allow
On 2019-09-02 12:12, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Eugen Hristev
>
> Some i2c controllers have a built-in digital or analog filter.
> This is specifically required depending on the hardware PCB/board.
> Some controllers also allow specifying the maximum width of the
> spikes that
From: Eugen Hristev
Some i2c controllers have a built-in digital or analog filter.
This is specifically required depending on the hardware PCB/board.
Some controllers also allow specifying the maximum width of the
spikes that can be filtered. The width length can be specified in nanoseconds.
6 matches
Mail list logo