On 05/08/2015 07:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:26:28PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
resume have been notified through
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:26:28PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
> hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
> resume have been notified through device_suspend/device_resume interfaces.
Does this mean that
There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
resume have been notified through device_suspend/device_resume interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 47
There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
resume have been notified through device_suspend/device_resume interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu baolu...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c |
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:26:28PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
resume have been notified through device_suspend/device_resume interfaces.
Does this mean that
On 05/08/2015 07:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:26:28PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
resume have been notified through
6 matches
Mail list logo
