On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> From: Jerome Marchand
>
> Currently looking at /proc//status or statm, there is no way to
> distinguish shmem pages from pages mapped to a regular file (shmem
> pages are mapped to /dev/zero), even though their implication in
> actual memory use is
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> From: Jerome Marchand
>
> Currently looking at /proc//status or statm, there is no way to
> distinguish shmem pages from pages mapped to a regular file (shmem
> pages are mapped to /dev/zero), even though their implication in
>
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:35:50 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> From: Jerome Marchand
Changelog is a bit weird.
> Currently looking at /proc//status or statm, there is no way to
> distinguish shmem pages from pages mapped to a regular file (shmem
> pages are mapped to /dev/zero), even though
From: Jerome Marchand
Currently looking at /proc//status or statm, there is no way to
distinguish shmem pages from pages mapped to a regular file (shmem
pages are mapped to /dev/zero), even though their implication in
actual memory use is quite different.
This patch adds MM_SHMEMPAGES counter to
From: Jerome Marchand
Currently looking at /proc//status or statm, there is no way to
distinguish shmem pages from pages mapped to a regular file (shmem
pages are mapped to /dev/zero), even though their implication in
actual memory use is quite different.
This patch adds
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:35:50 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> From: Jerome Marchand
Changelog is a bit weird.
> Currently looking at /proc//status or statm, there is no way to
> distinguish shmem pages from pages mapped to a regular file (shmem
> pages are
6 matches
Mail list logo