Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

2020-07-07 Thread Srinivas Kandagatla
On 07/07/2020 15:52, Doug Anderson wrote: Given that I've resolved previous feedback, I've been assuming that the series looks fine and we're sitting waiting for Rob Herring's blessings on the bindings before landing. Is that correct? That's correct! --srini

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

2020-07-07 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 7:49 AM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > From: Ravi Kumar Bokka > > This patch adds support for blowing fuses to the qfprom driver if the > required properties are defined in the device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Bokka > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson > --- >

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

2020-07-01 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:09 AM Ravi Kumar Bokka (Temp) wrote: > > Hi Doug, > I have tested v4 changes internally on target, if i am giving input as > unaligned address, it's not throwing any error message. You mean if you _read_ from an unaligned address, right? Yes, this is on purpose and

Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

2020-07-01 Thread Ravi Kumar Bokka (Temp)
Hi Doug, I have tested v4 changes internally on target, if i am giving input as unaligned address, it's not throwing any error message. On 6/22/2020 8:19 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: From: Ravi Kumar Bokka This patch adds support for blowing fuses to the qfprom driver if the required

[PATCH v4 3/4] nvmem: qfprom: Add fuse blowing support

2020-06-22 Thread Douglas Anderson
From: Ravi Kumar Bokka This patch adds support for blowing fuses to the qfprom driver if the required properties are defined in the device tree. Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Bokka Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson --- Changes in v4: - Only get clock/regulator if all address ranges are provided. -