Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 04 of September 2013 10:59:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Haojian Zhuang [130903 20:11]:
> > We can see that it'll try to find static mapping. What's the static
> > mapping? If we define iotable in machine driver, we have the static
> > mapping, just like debug_ll. If we parse
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 04 of September 2013 10:59:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@linaro.org [130903 20:11]:
We can see that it'll try to find static mapping. What's the static
mapping? If we define iotable in machine driver, we have the static
mapping, just like
* Haojian Zhuang [130903 20:11]:
>
> We can see that it'll try to find static mapping. What's the static mapping?
> If we define iotable in machine driver, we have the static mapping, just like
> debug_ll. If we parse everything from DTS file, it'll always get a new virtual
> address from vm
* Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@linaro.org [130903 20:11]:
We can see that it'll try to find static mapping. What's the static mapping?
If we define iotable in machine driver, we have the static mapping, just like
debug_ll. If we parse everything from DTS file, it'll always get a new virtual
On 31 August 2013 04:06, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 07:45 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> On 22 August 2013 13:53, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
>>> register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
>>>
On 31 August 2013 04:06, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/29/2013 07:45 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
On 22 August 2013 13:53, Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote:
Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
register the clock. Based on the
On 08/29/2013 07:45 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On 22 August 2013 13:53, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
>> register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
>>
>> A different approach to this was proposed in 2012[1]
On 08/29/2013 07:45 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
On 22 August 2013 13:53, Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote:
Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
A different approach to this was proposed
On 22 August 2013 13:53, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
> register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
>
> A different approach to this was proposed in 2012[1] and a similar
> binding was proposed more
On 22 August 2013 13:53, Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote:
Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
A different approach to this was proposed in 2012[1] and a similar
binding was proposed
Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
A different approach to this was proposed in 2012[1] and a similar
binding was proposed more recently[2] if anyone wants some extra
reading.
[1]
Device Tree binding for the basic clock gate, plus the setup function to
register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
A different approach to this was proposed in 2012[1] and a similar
binding was proposed more recently[2] if anyone wants some extra
reading.
[1]
12 matches
Mail list logo