On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:50:38PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski > that's not
> intentional. thanks for catching this
> >
> > Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch
> > (where I was supposed to move that chunk)?
>
> If
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:50:38PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski that's not
intentional. thanks for catching this
Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch
(where I was supposed to move that chunk)?
If it doesn't
On 2013/1/31 4:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski > that's not
> intentional. thanks for catching this
>>
>> Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch
>> (where I was supposed to move that chunk)?
>
> If it doesn't
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski > that's not
intentional. thanks for catching this
>
> Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch
> (where I was supposed to move that chunk)?
If it doesn't affect the next patch, just posting an updated
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:47:30PM +, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting a...@redhat.com (a...@redhat.com):
> > -
> > - if (rc)
> > - return rc;
>
> Was this intentional?
>
> I see that you next add
>
> rc = propagate_behavior(devcgroup);
>
>
Quoting a...@redhat.com (a...@redhat.com):
> This patch is in preparation for hierarchy support.
>
> This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo
> Cc: Tejun Heo
> Cc: Serge Hallyn
> Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski
>
> ---
> security/device_cgroup.c | 34
This patch is in preparation for hierarchy support.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Serge Hallyn
Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski
---
security/device_cgroup.c | 34 --
1 file changed, 16
This patch is in preparation for hierarchy support.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Cc: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski a...@redhat.com
---
security/device_cgroup.c |
Quoting a...@redhat.com (a...@redhat.com):
This patch is in preparation for hierarchy support.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Cc: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Aristeu
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:47:30PM +, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting a...@redhat.com (a...@redhat.com):
-
- if (rc)
- return rc;
Was this intentional?
I see that you next add
rc = propagate_behavior(devcgroup);
right here,
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski that's not
intentional. thanks for catching this
Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch
(where I was supposed to move that chunk)?
If it doesn't affect the next patch, just posting an updated version
of
On 2013/1/31 4:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski that's not
intentional. thanks for catching this
Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch
(where I was supposed to move that chunk)?
If it doesn't affect the next
12 matches
Mail list logo