On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:56:47PM -0700, Sonia Sharma wrote:
> From: Sonia Sharma <sonia.sha...@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> The switch statement in netvsc_send_completion() is incorrectly validating
> the length of incoming network packets by falling through to the next case.
> Avoid the fallthrough. Instead break after a case match and then process
> the complete() call.
> The current code has not caused any known failures. But nonetheless, the
> code should be corrected as a different ordering of the switch cases might
> cause a length check to fail when it should not.
> 
> Fixes: 44144185951a0f ("hv_netvsc: Add validation for untrusted Hyper-V 
> values")

As the current code is correct - it works - I feel that this is more of a
clean-up than a fix. As such I suggest dropping the fixes tag and
retargeting at net-next (which is due to re-open in the coming days).

> Signed-off-by: Sonia Sharma <sonia.sha...@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> * added return statement in default case as pointed by Michael Kelley.
> Changes in v4:
> * added fixes tag
> * modified commit message to explain the issue fixed by patch.
> ---
>  drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> index 82e9796c8f5e..0f7e4d377776 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void netvsc_send_completion(struct net_device 
> *ndev,
>                                  msglen);
>                       return;
>               }
> -             fallthrough;
> +             break;
>  
>       case NVSP_MSG1_TYPE_SEND_RECV_BUF_COMPLETE:
>               if (msglen < sizeof(struct nvsp_message_header) +
> @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static void netvsc_send_completion(struct net_device 
> *ndev,
>                                  msglen);
>                       return;
>               }
> -             fallthrough;
> +             break;
>  
>       case NVSP_MSG1_TYPE_SEND_SEND_BUF_COMPLETE:
>               if (msglen < sizeof(struct nvsp_message_header) +
> @@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static void netvsc_send_completion(struct net_device 
> *ndev,
>                                  msglen);
>                       return;
>               }
> -             fallthrough;
> +             break;
>  
>       case NVSP_MSG5_TYPE_SUBCHANNEL:
>               if (msglen < sizeof(struct nvsp_message_header) +
> @@ -878,10 +878,6 @@ static void netvsc_send_completion(struct net_device 
> *ndev,
>                                  msglen);
>                       return;
>               }
> -             /* Copy the response back */
> -             memcpy(&net_device->channel_init_pkt, nvsp_packet,
> -                    sizeof(struct nvsp_message));
> -             complete(&net_device->channel_init_wait);
>               break;
>  
>       case NVSP_MSG1_TYPE_SEND_RNDIS_PKT_COMPLETE:
> @@ -904,13 +900,19 @@ static void netvsc_send_completion(struct net_device 
> *ndev,
>  
>               netvsc_send_tx_complete(ndev, net_device, incoming_channel,
>                                       desc, budget);
> -             break;
> +             return;
>  
>       default:
>               netdev_err(ndev,
>                          "Unknown send completion type %d received!!\n",
>                          nvsp_packet->hdr.msg_type);
> +             return;
>       }
> +
> +     /* Copy the response back */
> +     memcpy(&net_device->channel_init_pkt, nvsp_packet,
> +                     sizeof(struct nvsp_message));

nit: the indentation of the line above is not correct.

        memcpy(&net_device->channel_init_pkt, nvsp_packet,
               sizeof(struct nvsp_message));

> +     complete(&net_device->channel_init_wait);
>  }
>  
>  static u32 netvsc_get_next_send_section(struct netvsc_device *net_device)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

Reply via email to