Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Al Stone
On 06/14/2016 08:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote: >> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > This is a

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Al Stone
On 06/14/2016 08:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote: >> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > This is a

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Al Stone
On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero >>> response since then. Already have one ACK from

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Al Stone
On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: >>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero >>> response since then. Already have one ACK from

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero > > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an > > arm64 maintainer

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero > > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an > > arm64 maintainer

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an > arm64 maintainer would be really helpful. I thought there were outstanding comments on

Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-14 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero > response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an > arm64 maintainer would be really helpful. I thought there were outstanding comments on

[RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-13 Thread Al Stone
This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an arm64 maintainer would be really helpful. The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January 2016, but the arm64 kernel

[RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-06-13 Thread Al Stone
This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an arm64 maintainer would be really helpful. The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January 2016, but the arm64 kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-26 Thread Al Stone
On 05/17/2016 10:30 AM, Al Stone wrote: > On 05/16/2016 05:44 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January 2016, but the arm64 kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-26 Thread Al Stone
On 05/17/2016 10:30 AM, Al Stone wrote: > On 05/16/2016 05:44 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January 2016, but the arm64 kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-17 Thread Al Stone
On 05/16/2016 05:44 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January >>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written >>> for

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-17 Thread Al Stone
On 05/16/2016 05:44 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January >>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written >>> for

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-16 Thread Alexey Klimov
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: > > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January > > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written > > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-16 Thread Alexey Klimov
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 09:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: > > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January > > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written > > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-12 Thread Roy Franz (HPE)
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January >> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written >> for the 5.1 version of the spec.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-12 Thread Roy Franz (HPE)
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January >> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written >> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-02 Thread Al Stone
On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the > spec that had not yet been

Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-05-02 Thread Al Stone
On 04/25/2016 03:21 PM, Al Stone wrote: > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the > spec that had not yet been

[PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-04-25 Thread Al Stone
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms added to

[PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

2016-04-25 Thread Al Stone
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms added to