[PATCH v5 0/3] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce DSP support for SM8650

2023-12-12 Thread Neil Armstrong
Add the bindings and driver changes for DSP support on the SM8650 platform in order to enable the aDSP, cDSP and MPSS subsystems to boot. Compared to SM8550, where SM8650 uses the same dual firmware files, (dtb file and main firmware) the memory zones requirement has changed: - cDSP: now requires

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add UFS host controller and Phy nodes for sc7280

2023-12-04 Thread Nitin Rawat
On 12/4/2023 3:54 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: This patch adds UFS host controller and Phy nodes for Qualcomm sc7280 SoC and enable it on some sc7280-based boards. Pick up the patchset from Nitin since the last revision (v4) has been sent end of September and is blocking qcm6490-fairphone-fp5 UFS.

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add UFS host controller and Phy nodes for sc7280

2023-12-04 Thread Luca Weiss
This patch adds UFS host controller and Phy nodes for Qualcomm sc7280 SoC and enable it on some sc7280-based boards. Pick up the patchset from Nitin since the last revision (v4) has been sent end of September and is blocking qcm6490-fairphone-fp5 UFS. --- Changes in v5: - Try to get patch tags

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] SM6375 remoteprocs

2023-09-20 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:33:20 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Resending as the previous revision was mostly ignored on the rproc side. > > Changes since v3: > - Pick up krzk's rb on bindings > - Drop patch 4 (applied) > Link to v3: >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] CAN TRANSCEIVER: Add support for CAN transceivers

2021-04-16 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 4/16/21 1:30 PM, Aswath Govindraju wrote: > The following series of patches add support for CAN transceivers. > > TCAN1042 has a standby signal that needs to be pulled high for > sending/receiving messages[1]. TCAN1043 has a enable signal along with > standby signal that needs to be pulled up

[PATCH v5 0/3] CAN TRANSCEIVER: Add support for CAN transceivers

2021-04-16 Thread Aswath Govindraju
The following series of patches add support for CAN transceivers. TCAN1042 has a standby signal that needs to be pulled high for sending/receiving messages[1]. TCAN1043 has a enable signal along with standby signal that needs to be pulled up for sending/receiving messages[2], and other

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add ZynqMP pinctrl driver

2021-04-15 Thread Sai Krishna Potthuri
Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP pinctrl driver and also update the Xilinx firmware driver to support pinctrl functionality. This driver queries the pin information from the firmware and allow configuring the pins as per the request. changes in v5: - Used generic property 'power-source' instead of

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging: rtl8192e: Cleanup patchset for style issues in rtl819x_HTProc.c

2021-04-13 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:15:03PM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:55:03AM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote: > > > Changes from v4:- > > > [PATCH v4 1/3]:- No changes. > > > [PATCH v4 2/3]:- No changes. > > > [PATCH V4

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging: rtl8192e: Cleanup patchset for style issues in rtl819x_HTProc.c

2021-04-13 Thread Mitali Borkar
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:55:03AM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote: > > Changes from v4:- > > [PATCH v4 1/3]:- No changes. > > [PATCH v4 2/3]:- No changes. > > [PATCH V4 3/3]:- Removed casts and parentheses. > > This series does not apply

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging: rtl8192e: Cleanup patchset for style issues in rtl819x_HTProc.c

2021-04-13 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:55:03AM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote: > Changes from v4:- > [PATCH v4 1/3]:- No changes. > [PATCH v4 2/3]:- No changes. > [PATCH V4 3/3]:- Removed casts and parentheses. This series does not apply cleanly, please rebase and resend. thanks, greg k-h

[PATCH v5 0/3] staging: rtl8192e: Cleanup patchset for style issues in rtl819x_HTProc.c

2021-04-12 Thread Mitali Borkar
Changes from v4:- [PATCH v4 1/3]:- No changes. [PATCH v4 2/3]:- No changes. [PATCH V4 3/3]:- Removed casts and parentheses. Changes from v3:- Changed subject line to match prefix on the patches. [PATCH v3 1/3]:- No changes. [PATCH v3 2/3]:- No changes. [PATCH V3 3/3]:- No changes. Changes from

[PATCH v5 0/3] Move kernel mapping outside the linear mapping

2021-04-11 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
I decided to split sv48 support in small series to ease the review. This patchset pushes the kernel mapping (modules and BPF too) to the last 4GB of the 64bit address space, this allows to: - implement relocatable kernel (that will come later in another patchset) that requires to move the

[PATCH v5 0/3] Input: add Hycon HY46XX Touchscreen controller

2021-04-11 Thread Giulio Benetti
This patchset adds Hycon vendor, HY46XX touchscreen controller driver and its .yaml binding. --- V1->V2: * changed authorship and SoBs to @benettiengineering.com domain * fixed vendor commit log according to Jonathan Neuschäfer's suggestion * fixed hy46xx bindings according to Rob Herring's

[PATCH v5 0/3] CET fix patches for nested guest

2021-04-09 Thread Yang Weijiang
This patch series is to fix a few issues found during patch review and testing on Linux, also including a patch to explictly disable CET support in nested guest over Hyper-V(s). change in v5: - Changed condition to snapshot CET state to vmcs01 per Sean's feedback. - Remove mixed fix code for MPX.

[PATCH v5 0/3] sched/fair: load-balance vs capacity margins

2021-04-07 Thread Valentin Schneider
Hi folks, I split up the extra misfit patches from v3 as I'm still playing around with those following Vincent's comments. In the meantime, I believe the first few patches of the series can still be considered as standalone. o Patch 1 prevents pcpu kworkers from causing group_imbalanced o Patch

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: OTP support

2021-04-02 Thread Tudor Ambarus
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:51:37 +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > This patchset implements the MTD OTP functions to allow access to the SPI > OTP data. Specific support is added for Winbond flash chips. > > In the past there was already an attempt by Rahul Bedarkar to add this, but > there was no

[PATCH v5 0/3] media: i2c: Introduce driver for the TW9900 decoder

2021-04-01 Thread Maxime Chevallier
Hello everyone, This is the fifth version of the series adding support for the Techwell TW9900 multi standard decoder. It's a pretty simple decoder compared to the TW9910, since it doesn't have a built-in scaler/crop engine. this fifth version addresses reviews by Hans and Rob, with the notable

[PATCH v5 0/3] mainline ti tsc2046 adc driver

2021-03-29 Thread Oleksij Rempel
changes v5: - remove type for the settling-time-us property changes v4: - spell fixes - add more comments - make code more readable - move scan_buf to the priv - use FIELD_GET to extract ADC data - make some multi line code as one line - do not use atomic API for trig_more_count - fix build

[PATCH v5 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: OTP support

2021-03-21 Thread Michael Walle
This patchset implements the MTD OTP functions to allow access to the SPI OTP data. Specific support is added for Winbond flash chips. In the past there was already an attempt by Rahul Bedarkar to add this, but there was no response. These patches are slightly based on his work.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for secure regions in NAND

2021-03-18 Thread Manivannan Sadhasivam
Hi Miquel, On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Manivannan, > > Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote on Wed, > 17 Mar 2021 17:55:10 +0530: > > > On a typical end product, a vendor may choose to secure some regions in > > the NAND memory which are supposed to stay intact

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for secure regions in NAND

2021-03-17 Thread Miquel Raynal
Hi Manivannan, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:55:10 +0530: > On a typical end product, a vendor may choose to secure some regions in > the NAND memory which are supposed to stay intact between FW upgrades. > The access to those regions will be blocked by a secure element

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for secure regions in NAND

2021-03-17 Thread Manivannan Sadhasivam
On a typical end product, a vendor may choose to secure some regions in the NAND memory which are supposed to stay intact between FW upgrades. The access to those regions will be blocked by a secure element like Trustzone. So the normal world software like Linux kernel should not touch these

[PATCH v5 0/3] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection

2021-03-12 Thread Fenghua Yu
A bus lock [1] is acquired through either split locked access to writeback (WB) memory or any locked access to non-WB memory. This is typically >1000 cycles slower than an atomic operation within a cache line. It also disrupts performance on other cores. Although split lock can be detected by #AC

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] arm64: Add TI AM65x-based IOT2050 boards

2021-03-11 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:33:40 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Changes in v4: > - dropped spidev node > - rebased over ti-k3-dts-next > > Jan > > Jan Kiszka (3): > dt-bindings: Add Siemens vendor prefix > dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Siemens IOT2050 boards > arm64: dts: ti: Add

[PATCH v5 0/3] arm64: Add TI AM65x-based IOT2050 boards

2021-03-11 Thread Jan Kiszka
Changes in v4: - dropped spidev node - rebased over ti-k3-dts-next Jan Jan Kiszka (3): dt-bindings: Add Siemens vendor prefix dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Siemens IOT2050 boards arm64: dts: ti: Add support for Siemens IOT2050 boards .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml

[PATCH v5 0/3] J7200: Add support for GPIO and higher speed modes in MMCSD subsystems

2021-03-10 Thread Aswath Govindraju
The following series of patches - Add support for GPIO subsystem in main and wakeup domains. - Add voltage regulator device tree nodes and their corresponding pinmux to support power cycle and voltage switch required for UHS-I modes - sets respective tags in sdhci0 node to support higher speeds

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE

2021-03-08 Thread Claudio Imbrenda
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:26:58 +0100 Janosch Frank wrote: > On 3/8/21 4:19 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 02.03.21 18:44, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > >> The current handling of the MVPG instruction when executed in a > >> nested guest is wrong, and can lead to the nested guest hanging. >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE

2021-03-08 Thread Janosch Frank
On 3/8/21 4:19 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 02.03.21 18:44, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: >> The current handling of the MVPG instruction when executed in a nested >> guest is wrong, and can lead to the nested guest hanging. >> >> This patchset fixes the behaviour to be more architecturally

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE

2021-03-08 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 02.03.21 18:44, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: The current handling of the MVPG instruction when executed in a nested guest is wrong, and can lead to the nested guest hanging. This patchset fixes the behaviour to be more architecturally correct, and fixes the hangs observed. v4->v5 * split

[PATCH v5 0/3] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE

2021-03-02 Thread Claudio Imbrenda
The current handling of the MVPG instruction when executed in a nested guest is wrong, and can lead to the nested guest hanging. This patchset fixes the behaviour to be more architecturally correct, and fixes the hangs observed. v4->v5 * split kvm_s390_logical_to_effective so it can be reused

[PATCH v5 0/3] Support wakeup methods of Atmel maXTouch controllers

2021-03-02 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
Some Atmel maXTouch controllers, like mXT1386 and mXT3432S1 for example, have a WAKE line that needs to be asserted in order to wake controller from a deep sleep, otherwise it will be unusable. This series implements support for the wakeup methods in accordance to the mXT1386 datasheet [1], see

[PATCH v5 0/3] Serialize execution environment changes for MHI

2021-02-19 Thread Bhaumik Bhatt
v5: -Update commit text for "clear devices when moving execution environments" patch -Added test platform details that were missed out in the cover letter -Merged two if checks in to a single one for EE serialization patch v4: -Addressed review comments for additional info logging for EE

[PATCH v5 0/3] Some optimizations related to sgx

2021-02-15 Thread Tianjia Zhang
This is an optimization of a set of sgx-related codes, each of which is independent of the patch. Because the second and third patches have conflicting dependencies, these patches are put together. --- v5 changes: * Remove the two patches with no actual value * Typo fix in commit message v4

[PATCH v5 0/3] mm, vsprintf: dump full information of page flags in pGp

2021-02-15 Thread Yafang Shao
The existed pGp shows the names of page flags only, rather than the full information including section, node, zone, last cpuipid and kasan tag. While it is not easy to parse these information manually because there are so many flavors. We'd better interpret them in printf. To be compitable with

[PATCH v5 0/3] Adding the Sparx5 Switch Reset Driver

2021-02-10 Thread Steen Hegelund
This series provides the Microchip Sparx5 Switch Reset Driver The Sparx5 Switch SoC has a number of components that can be reset individually, but at least the Switch Core needs to be in a well defined state at power on, when any of the Sparx5 drivers starts to access the Switch Core, this reset

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Nick Desaulniers
Moving a bunch of folks + lists to BCC. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:54 PM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 7:13 PM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:58 PM Andrii Nakryiko > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:31 PM Nick Desaulniers > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 7:13 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:58 PM Andrii Nakryiko > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:31 PM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:14 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Em Fri, Jan

[PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce SCMI System Power Control driver

2021-02-04 Thread Cristian Marussi
Hi This series, building on top of the recently introduced SCMI System Power Protocol support, adds a new SCMI driver which, registering for SystemPower notifications, acts accordingly to satisfy SCMI plaform system transitions requests like shutdown/reboot both of graceful and forceful kind.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:42 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:58 AM Andrii Nakryiko > wrote: > ... > > > > Is there another (easy) way to get your patch set without the b4 tool? > > Is your patch set present in some patchworks instance, so that I can > > download it in mbox

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:58 AM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: ... > > Is there another (easy) way to get your patch set without the b4 tool? > Is your patch set present in some patchworks instance, so that I can > download it in mbox format, for example? > Just to promote the b4 tool - we have some cool

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

2021-02-04 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Viresh, On 2/4/21 2:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 03-02-21, 17:23, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: >> The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based >> on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the >> sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

2021-02-04 Thread Hsin-Yi Wang
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:41 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 03-02-21, 17:23, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > > The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based > > on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the > > sense of device hierarchy). As of today,

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

2021-02-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 03-02-21, 17:23, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based > on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the > sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the passive governor requires one > of the following to work

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-03 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:58 PM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:31 PM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:14 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > wrote: > > > > > > Em Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu: > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-03 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:31 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:14 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > > > Em Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu: > > > > > > > > > On 1/15/21 3:34 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-03 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:14 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu: > > > > > > On 1/15/21 3:34 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/15/21

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

2021-02-03 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Hsin-Yi, Thanks for the patch. I already reviewed this patch. But, I'll check these again and test it. On 2/3/21 6:23 PM, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based > on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov

2021-02-03 Thread Hsin-Yi Wang
The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the passive governor requires one of the following to work correctly: 1. The parent and child device have the

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for Boundary Nitrogen8M Mini SBC

2021-01-27 Thread Adrien Grassein
Hello Shawn, Could you please have a look at the new patch set made after your commentaries? Thank a lot for your time, Thanks, Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 12:15, Adrien Grassein a écrit : > > Hello, > > This patch set aims is to add the support of the Nitrogen8M Mini SBC > from Boundary Devices.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] GENPD API improvements

2021-01-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:45 AM Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > > Hi, > > This series is a prerequisite for the power domain driver of NVIDIA Tegra > SoCs [1]. It extends the GENPD core with a better support of performance > states and eases linking of child/parent PDs for the PD drivers. > > [1]

[PATCH v5 0/3] Driver for Core Power Reduction v3, v4 and Hardened

2021-01-21 Thread AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
** ** NOTE: To "view the full picture", please look at the following ** patch series: ** https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=413355 ** This is a subset of that series. ** Changes in v5: - Fixed getting OPP table when not yet installed by the

[PATCH v5 0/3] GENPD API improvements

2021-01-20 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
Hi, This series is a prerequisite for the power domain driver of NVIDIA Tegra SoCs [1]. It extends the GENPD core with a better support of performance states and eases linking of child/parent PDs for the PD drivers. [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=221130

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for Boundary Nitrogen8M Mini SBC

2021-01-18 Thread Adrien Grassein
Hello, This patch set aims is to add the support of the Nitrogen8M Mini SBC from Boundary Devices. Thanks, Update in v2: - Rewrite the dts (Remove the unused wlan and audio); - Remove useless definition; - Take in account review. Update in v3: - Take in account review. Update in v4:

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-17 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu: > > > On 1/15/21 3:34 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/15/21 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > En plus, I encountered breakage with GCC v10.2.1

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] rtc: s5m: driver improvements

2021-01-16 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:22:16 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > This is a set of improvements for the rtc-s5m driver. The first patch > is new in v4: I noticed the I2C regmap is not selected by this driver's > Kconfig. Two subsequent patches were already submitted separately. > > v1 -> v2: > -

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-15 Thread Yonghong Song
On 1/15/21 3:34 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 PM Yonghong Song wrote: On 1/15/21 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: En plus, I encountered breakage with GCC v10.2.1 and LLVM=1 and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4. So might be good to add a "depends on !DEBUG_INFO_BTF" in

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-15 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:34 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > > > > > On 1/15/21 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > En plus, I encountered breakage with GCC v10.2.1 and LLVM=1 and > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4. > > > So might be good to

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-15 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > On 1/15/21 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > En plus, I encountered breakage with GCC v10.2.1 and LLVM=1 and > > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4. > > So might be good to add a "depends on !DEBUG_INFO_BTF" in this combination. Can you privately

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-15 Thread Yonghong Song
On 1/15/21 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:06 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size when mixed with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). Link:

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:06 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size when mixed with compression > (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pdf > > Patch 1 is

[PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-15 Thread Nick Desaulniers
DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size when mixed with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pdf Patch 1 is a cleanup from Masahiro and isn't DWARF v5 specific. Patch 2 is a

[PATCH v5 0/3] rtc: s5m: driver improvements

2021-01-14 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski This is a set of improvements for the rtc-s5m driver. The first patch is new in v4: I noticed the I2C regmap is not selected by this driver's Kconfig. Two subsequent patches were already submitted separately. v1 -> v2: - remove the remove() callback v2 -> v3: - fix an

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-13 Thread Heikki Krogerus
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 06:09:28AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 1/12/21 3:59 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:53:56PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: > >>> This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision

Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] Decouple config data for configfs

2021-01-12 Thread Melissa Wen
On 01/12, Sumera Priyadarsini wrote: > This patchset aims to lay down some prep work before configfs can be > implemented for the vkms driver. The first patch in the series adds a > new type vkms_config to track device configuration. The second and third > patch add module testing support for

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-12 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 1/12/21 3:59 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:53:56PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: >>> This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" >>>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-12 Thread Heikki Krogerus
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: > This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217030632.903718-1-kyle...@google.com > and two more patches "Protocol Error handling" and "Respond Wait if...". > > The patch "AMS

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-12 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:57:28PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 1/12/21 12:53 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: > >> This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" > >>

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-12 Thread Heikki Krogerus
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:53:56PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: > > This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217030632.903718-1-kyle...@google.com > > and two more patches "Protocol

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 1/12/21 12:53 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: >> This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217030632.903718-1-kyle...@google.com >> and two more patches "Protocol Error handling"

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-12 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:39:24AM +0800, Kyle Tso wrote: > This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217030632.903718-1-kyle...@google.com > and two more patches "Protocol Error handling" and "Respond Wait if...". > > The patch "AMS

[PATCH V5 0/3] Decouple config data for configfs

2021-01-11 Thread Sumera Priyadarsini
This patchset aims to lay down some prep work before configfs can be implemented for the vkms driver. The first patch in the series adds a new type vkms_config to track device configuration. The second and third patch add module testing support for writeback operations. The first patch is

[PATCH v5 0/3] AMS, Collision Avoidance, and Protocol Error

2021-01-05 Thread Kyle Tso
This series include previous patch "[v4] AMS and Collision Avoidance" https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217030632.903718-1-kyle...@google.com and two more patches "Protocol Error handling" and "Respond Wait if...". The patch "AMS and Collision Avoidance" in [v5] is the same as the one in [v4] (only

[PATCH v5 0/3] media: rockchip: Introduce driver for Rockchip's camera interface

2020-12-29 Thread Maxime Chevallier
Hi everyone, This is the fifth iteration of the series introducing a driver for the PX30 camera interface. This was previously known as the "cif" driver in other iterations, but was renamed to "vip" following Ezequiel's advices to match the datasheet name. This is based on a BSP driver, and I'm

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to serial converters

2020-12-14 Thread Johan Hovold
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:21:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > > > Hello, > > > > This series adds support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to serial converters. > > This driver only

[PATCH v5 0/3] BPi M2 Zero poweroff support via new regulator-poweroff driver

2020-12-11 Thread Michael Klein
Changes in v2: - rename DT node Changes in v3: - add regulator-poweroff driver - use regulator-poweroff driver instead of gpio-poweroff Changes in v4: - hardcode poweroff timeout to 3000ms, not configurable any more - remove support for multiple regulators - fix Documentation issues

Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] cpufreq_cooling: Get effective CPU utilization from scheduler

2020-12-08 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 08-12-20, 15:50, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:46:54AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Viresh Kumar (3): > > sched/core: Move schedutil_cpu_util() to core.c > > sched/core: Rename schedutil_cpu_util() and allow rest of the kernel > > to use it > > thermal:

Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] cpufreq_cooling: Get effective CPU utilization from scheduler

2020-12-08 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:46:54AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Viresh Kumar (3): > sched/core: Move schedutil_cpu_util() to core.c > sched/core: Rename schedutil_cpu_util() and allow rest of the kernel > to use it > thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Reuse sched_cpu_util() for SMP platforms How

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to serial converters

2020-12-08 Thread Manivannan Sadhasivam
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > Hello, > > This series adds support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to serial converters. > This driver only supports XR21V141X series but it can easily be extended > to other series in future. > >

[PATCH V5 0/3] cpufreq_cooling: Get effective CPU utilization from scheduler

2020-12-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi, This patchset makes the cpufreq_cooling driver reuse the CPU utilization metric provided by the scheduler instead of depending on idle and busy times of a CPU, which aren't that accurate to measure the busyness of a CPU for the next cycle. More details can be seen in the commit logs of the

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to serial converters

2020-11-22 Thread Manivannan Sadhasivam
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam Hello, This series adds support for MaxLinear/Exar USB to serial converters. This driver only supports XR21V141X series but it can easily be extended to other series in future. This driver is inspired from the initial one submitted by Patong Yang:

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] media: rkvdec: Add a VP9 backend

2020-11-10 Thread Adrian Ratiu
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 00:28 +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote: Hi Ezequiel, On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 16:04, Adrian Ratiu > wrote: > > Dear all, This is v5 of the series adding VP9 profile 0 > > decoding

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] media: rkvdec: Add a VP9 backend

2020-11-10 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 00:28 +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Hi Ezequiel, > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Ezequiel Garcia > wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 16:04, Adrian Ratiu > > wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > This is v5 of the series adding VP9 profile 0 decoding to > > > rkvdec. > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] media: rkvdec: Add a VP9 backend

2020-11-10 Thread Adrian Ratiu
Hi Ezequiel, On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 16:04, Adrian Ratiu wrote: Dear all, This is v5 of the series adding VP9 profile 0 decoding to rkvdec. All feedback from v4 should be addressed, there's just one thing I did not address:

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] media: rkvdec: Add a VP9 backend

2020-11-10 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 16:04, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is v5 of the series adding VP9 profile 0 decoding to rkvdec. > > All feedback from v4 should be addressed, there's just one thing I did > not address: ref_frame_sign_biases in the uAPI. The userspace tool I'm I believe that

Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Improve memory offline event notifier

2020-11-10 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:58:54 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This series brings three different changes to the only memory event notifier > on > arm64 platform. These changes improve it's robustness while also enhancing > debug > capabilities during potential memory offlining error conditions.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: keep lock bits if they are non-volatile

2020-11-10 Thread Vignesh Raghavendra
On 10/28/20 3:56 AM, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2020-10-03 17:32, schrieb Michael Walle: >> I bundled this as a series, because otherwise there will be conflicts >> because the "remove global protection flag" patches modify the same lines >> as the main patch. >> >> See invdividual patches for

[PATCH V5 0/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Improve memory offline event notifier

2020-11-08 Thread Anshuman Khandual
This series brings three different changes to the only memory event notifier on arm64 platform. These changes improve it's robustness while also enhancing debug capabilities during potential memory offlining error conditions. This applies on 5.10-rc3 Changes in V5: - Added some more

[PATCH v5 0/3] dmaengine: Add support for QCOM GSI dma controller

2020-11-03 Thread Vinod Koul
This series adds support for Qcom GSI dma controller found on Qualcomm SoCs. This controller can program the peripheral configuration so we add additional parameters in dma_slave_config for configuring the peripherals like spi and i2c. Changes in v5: - Add acked by Rob - Move qcom-gpi-dma.h

[PATCH v5 0/3] MT8192 SMI support

2020-11-02 Thread Yong Wu
This patchset mainly adds SMI support for mt8192. It comes from the patchset[1]. I seperate the smi part into this patchset. And the two part(IOMMU/SMI) patchset don't depend on each other. Rebase on v5.10-rc1. changenote: v5: Fix complain from yamllint. v4:

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] net, mac80211, kernel: enable KCOV remote coverage collection for 802.11 frame handling

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:36:17 + Aleksandr Nogikh wrote: > From: Aleksandr Nogikh > > This patch series enables remote KCOV coverage collection during > 802.11 frames processing. These changes make it possible to perform > coverage-guided fuzzing in search of remotely triggerable bugs. > >

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for VBUS detection

2020-11-02 Thread Guru Das Srinagesh
Add support to enable VBUS detection in the pm8941 extcon driver. Changes from v4: - Drop addition of new compatible string in both bindings and driver. Changes from v3: - Split bindings into direct conversion of txt file, and addition of VBUS detection support. Changes from v2: - Fix YAML

[PATCH v5 0/3] media: rkvdec: Add a VP9 backend

2020-11-02 Thread Adrian Ratiu
Dear all, This is v5 of the series adding VP9 profile 0 decoding to rkvdec. All feedback from v4 should be addressed, there's just one thing I did not address: ref_frame_sign_biases in the uAPI. The userspace tool I'm using [1] apparently doesn't need it or the default hwreg value for it is

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Support maintaining bootloader mappings

2020-10-29 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:23:20 -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > This is the revised fourth attempt of inheriting the stream mapping for > the framebuffer on many Qualcomm platforms, in order to not hit > catastrophic faults during arm-smmu initialization. > > The new approach does, based on Robin's

[PATCH v5 0/3] net, mac80211, kernel: enable KCOV remote coverage collection for 802.11 frame handling

2020-10-29 Thread Aleksandr Nogikh
From: Aleksandr Nogikh This patch series enables remote KCOV coverage collection during 802.11 frames processing. These changes make it possible to perform coverage-guided fuzzing in search of remotely triggerable bugs. Normally, KCOV collects coverage information for the code that is executed

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] time namespace aware system boot time

2020-10-29 Thread Christian Brauner
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:42:55PM +0100, Michael Weiß wrote: > Time namespaces make it possible to virtualize time inside of > containers, e.g., it is feasible to reset the uptime of a container > to zero by setting the time namespace offset for boottime to the > negated current value of the

[PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for mv88e6393x family of Marvell

2020-10-27 Thread Pavana Sharma
Updated patchset. Pavana Sharma (3): net: phy: Add 5GBASER interface mode dt-bindings: net: Add 5GBASER phy interface mode net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for mv88e6393x family of Marvell .../bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml | 2 + drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: keep lock bits if they are non-volatile

2020-10-27 Thread Michael Walle
Am 2020-10-03 17:32, schrieb Michael Walle: I bundled this as a series, because otherwise there will be conflicts because the "remove global protection flag" patches modify the same lines as the main patch. See invdividual patches for the version history. any news here? -michael

[PATCH v5 0/3] time namespace aware system boot time

2020-10-27 Thread Michael Weiß
Time namespaces make it possible to virtualize time inside of containers, e.g., it is feasible to reset the uptime of a container to zero by setting the time namespace offset for boottime to the negated current value of the CLOCK_BOOTTIME. However, the boot time stamp provided by getboottime64()

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Support maintaining bootloader mappings

2020-10-22 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On 10/19/20 1:23 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > This is the revised fourth attempt of inheriting the stream mapping for > the framebuffer on many Qualcomm platforms, in order to not hit > catastrophic faults during arm-smmu initialization. > > The new approach does, based on Robin's suggestion,

[PATCH v5 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Support maintaining bootloader mappings

2020-10-19 Thread Bjorn Andersson
This is the revised fourth attempt of inheriting the stream mapping for the framebuffer on many Qualcomm platforms, in order to not hit catastrophic faults during arm-smmu initialization. The new approach does, based on Robin's suggestion, take a much more direct approach with the allocation of a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >