Hi Viresh,
On 2/4/21 2:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 03-02-21, 17:23, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>> The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based
>> on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the
>> sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:41 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 03-02-21, 17:23, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based
> > on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the
> > sense of device hierarchy). As of today,
On 03-02-21, 17:23, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based
> on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the
> sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the passive governor requires one
> of the following to work
Hi Hsin-Yi,
Thanks for the patch. I already reviewed this patch.
But, I'll check these again and test it.
On 2/3/21 6:23 PM, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based
> on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the
The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based
on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the
sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the passive governor requires one
of the following to work correctly:
1. The parent and child device have the
5 matches
Mail list logo