Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] RFC: Secure Memory Allocation Framework

2015-10-21 Thread Benjamin Gaignard
2015-10-21 16:34 GMT+02:00 James Morris : > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > >> >> The outcome of the previous RFC about how do secure data path was the need >> of a secure memory allocator (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/551) >> > > Have you addressed all the questions raised by Ala

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] RFC: Secure Memory Allocation Framework

2015-10-21 Thread James Morris
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > The outcome of the previous RFC about how do secure data path was the need > of a secure memory allocator (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/5/551) > Have you addressed all the questions raised by Alan here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/8/629 Also,

[PATCH v5 0/3] RFC: Secure Memory Allocation Framework

2015-10-21 Thread Benjamin Gaignard
version 5 changes: - rebased on kernel 4.3-rc6 - rework locking schema and make handle status use an atomic_t - add a fake secure module to allow performing tests without trusted environment version 4 changes: - rebased on kernel 4.3-rc3 - fix missing EXPORT_SYMBOL for smaf_create_handle()