On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 09:09:26 AM James Morse wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 14/09/16 02:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > What's the status of this?
>
> Will has queued it in his for-next/core branch.
OK, thanks!
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 09:09:26 AM James Morse wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 14/09/16 02:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > What's the status of this?
>
> Will has queued it in his for-next/core branch.
OK, thanks!
Hi Rafael,
On 14/09/16 02:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> What's the status of this?
Will has queued it in his for-next/core branch.
Thanks,
James
Hi Rafael,
On 14/09/16 02:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> What's the status of this?
Will has queued it in his for-next/core branch.
Thanks,
James
On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 01:50:24 PM James Morse wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> These patches allow arm64 to hibernate on any CPU saving the cpu-id in the
> arch header, then switch to it during resume using
> hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable().
>
> I hoped to avoid patch 1 by duplicating the
On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 01:50:24 PM James Morse wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> These patches allow arm64 to hibernate on any CPU saving the cpu-id in the
> arch header, then switch to it during resume using
> hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable().
>
> I hoped to avoid patch 1 by duplicating the
Hi all,
These patches allow arm64 to hibernate on any CPU saving the cpu-id in the
arch header, then switch to it during resume using
hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable().
I hoped to avoid patch 1 by duplicating the logic in the arch code, but
Lorenzo pointed out using cpu_down() indicates
Hi all,
These patches allow arm64 to hibernate on any CPU saving the cpu-id in the
arch header, then switch to it during resume using
hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable().
I hoped to avoid patch 1 by duplicating the logic in the arch code, but
Lorenzo pointed out using cpu_down() indicates
8 matches
Mail list logo