On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:23:48PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
> >> -next. It's been running happily for a
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
>> -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
>> devices.
>
> I'm not familiar with
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
>> -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
>> devices.
>
> I'm not familiar with
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
> -next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
> devices.
I'm not familiar with seccomp in general, but the changes look ok now from
an ARM
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
devices.
I'm not familiar with seccomp in general, but the changes look ok now from
an ARM
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
devices.
I'm not
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
devices.
I'm not
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:23:48PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:07:13PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
devices.
Thanks,
-Kees
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
>> improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping
>> and nr changes more consistent"), this passes
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
improvement patch waiting in linux-next (seccomp: Make syscall skipping
and nr changes more consistent),
Hi, any more thoughts on this series? I'd really like to get it into
-next. It's been running happily for a while now in the Chrome OS ARM
devices.
Thanks,
-Kees
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org wrote:
This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with
On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
> improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping
> and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression
> test suite:
On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
improvement patch waiting in linux-next (seccomp: Make syscall skipping
and nr changes more consistent), this passes the seccomp regression
test suite:
This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping
and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression
test suite: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp
Thanks,
-Kees
---
v5:
- clean up
This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
improvement patch waiting in linux-next (seccomp: Make syscall skipping
and nr changes more consistent), this passes the seccomp regression
test suite: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp
Thanks,
-Kees
---
v5:
- clean up
16 matches
Mail list logo