Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] sched: Add on_rq states and remove several double rq locks

* Kirill Tkhai wrote: > v5: New names: TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED, TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, task_on_rq_migrating() > and task_on_rq_queued(). > > I've pulled the latest version from peterz/queue.git, and Peter's changes > are included. > > This series aims to get rid of some places where locks of

[PATCH v5 0/5] sched: Add on_rq states and remove several double rq locks

v5: New names: TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED, TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, task_on_rq_migrating() and task_on_rq_queued(). I've pulled the latest version from peterz/queue.git, and Peter's changes are included. This series aims to get rid of some places where locks of two RQs are held at the same time.

[PATCH v5 0/5] sched: Add on_rq states and remove several double rq locks

v5: New names: TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED, TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, task_on_rq_migrating() and task_on_rq_queued(). I've pulled the latest version from peterz/queue.git, and Peter's changes are included. This series aims to get rid of some places where locks of two RQs are held at the same time.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] sched: Add on_rq states and remove several double rq locks

* Kirill Tkhai ktk...@parallels.com wrote: v5: New names: TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED, TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, task_on_rq_migrating() and task_on_rq_queued(). I've pulled the latest version from peterz/queue.git, and Peter's changes are included. This series aims to get rid of some places