Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:47:20 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > This happens when a header file, elf.h, on "your host machine" does not have > definitions of EM_AARCH64 nor R_AARCH64_ABS64 because "recordmcount" is a > binary > utility on host(x86), not target. It is very likely for most distros.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:47:20 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > This happens when a header file, elf.h, on "your host machine" does not have > definitions of EM_AARCH64 nor R_AARCH64_ABS64 because "recordmcount" is a > binary > utility on host(x86), not target. It is very likely for most distros. >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Hi, On 03/11/2014 11:35 PM, Will Deacon wrote: Hi Akashi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:18:37AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: This patchset implements a function tracer on arm64. There was another implementation from Cavium network, but both of us agreed to use my patchset as future base. He is

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Akashi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:18:37AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > This patchset implements a function tracer on arm64. > There was another implementation from Cavium network, but both of us agreed > to use my patchset as future base. He is supposed to review this code, too. > > The

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Akashi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:18:37AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: This patchset implements a function tracer on arm64. There was another implementation from Cavium network, but both of us agreed to use my patchset as future base. He is supposed to review this code, too. The only

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Hi, On 03/11/2014 11:35 PM, Will Deacon wrote: Hi Akashi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:18:37AM +, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: This patchset implements a function tracer on arm64. There was another implementation from Cavium network, but both of us agreed to use my patchset as future base. He is

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:47:20 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.aka...@linaro.org wrote: This happens when a header file, elf.h, on your host machine does not have definitions of EM_AARCH64 nor R_AARCH64_ABS64 because recordmcount is a binary utility on host(x86), not target. It is very likely

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-03-11 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:47:20 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.aka...@linaro.org wrote: This happens when a header file, elf.h, on your host machine does not have definitions of EM_AARCH64 nor R_AARCH64_ABS64 because recordmcount is a binary utility on host(x86), not target. It is very likely

[PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-02-27 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
This patchset implements a function tracer on arm64. There was another implementation from Cavium network, but both of us agreed to use my patchset as future base. He is supposed to review this code, too. The only issue that I had some concern on was "fault protection" code in

[PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Add ftrace support

2014-02-27 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
This patchset implements a function tracer on arm64. There was another implementation from Cavium network, but both of us agreed to use my patchset as future base. He is supposed to review this code, too. The only issue that I had some concern on was fault protection code in