On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 04:34:12 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 07/05/2014 04:13 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:53:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> >>> My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
> >>>
> >>>
On 7 May 2014 19:04, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Do you want me to resend the entire patch set or only patch 1/8?
Probably a new patch which would make it inline that's it. I don't think
he is going to rebase his branch now..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi Rafael,
On 07/05/2014 04:13 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:53:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>>> My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
>>>
>>> Rafael,
>>> A solution could be to make cpufreq_next_valid an inline function in
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:53:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> > My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
> >
> > Rafael,
> > A solution could be to make cpufreq_next_valid an inline function in
> > cpufreq.h,
> > but as Viresh mentioned this would be very
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:53:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
Rafael,
A solution could be to make cpufreq_next_valid an inline function in
cpufreq.h,
but as Viresh mentioned this would be
Hi Rafael,
On 07/05/2014 04:13 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:53:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
Rafael,
A solution could be to make cpufreq_next_valid an inline function
On 7 May 2014 19:04, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
Do you want me to resend the entire patch set or only patch 1/8?
Probably a new patch which would make it inline that's it. I don't think
he is going to rebase his branch now..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 04:34:12 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On 07/05/2014 04:13 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:53:16 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
>
> Rafael,
> A solution could be to make cpufreq_next_valid an inline function in
> cpufreq.h,
> but as Viresh mentioned this would be very inefficient because of multiple
> copies.
That statement was true when we
Hi all,
On 06/05/2014 06:24 μμ, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Stratos,
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>>> On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos
Hi Stratos,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> >> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper
On 6 May 2014 23:25, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
My bad. I'm sorry for this. :(
Rafael,
A solution could be to make cpufreq_next_valid an inline function in
cpufreq.h,
but as Viresh mentioned this would be very inefficient because of multiple
copies.
That statement was
Hi Stratos,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
This patch set
Hi all,
On 06/05/2014 06:24 μμ, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Stratos,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos
On 30/04/2014 01:26 πμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can be used
On 30/04/2014 01:26 πμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> >> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
> >> can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
> >>
On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
>> can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
>> makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
>> use such
On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can be used for iteration over
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
> can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
> makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
> use such an iteration procedure.
>
> The motivation was a
On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
use such an iteration procedure.
The
Hi all,
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
use such an iteration procedure.
The motivation was a usage of common procedure to iterate over
Hi all,
This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
use such an iteration procedure.
The motivation was a usage of common procedure to iterate over
24 matches
Mail list logo
