On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:39:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:23:40 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
> wrote:
>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > mm-prepare-to-remove-proc-sys-vm-hugepages_treat_as_movable.patch had a
> > > conflict with
> > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-huget
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:23:40 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > mm-prepare-to-remove-proc-sys-vm-hugepages_treat_as_movable.patch had a
> > conflict with
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-hugetlb-move-up-the-code-which-check-availability-of-free-huge-page.patch
> > which I
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:40:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 01:21:33 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
> wrote:
>
> > Here is the 5th version of hugepage migration patchset.
> > Changes in this version are as follows:
> > - removed putback_active_hugepages() as a cleanup (1/9)
> >
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 01:21:33 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi
wrote:
> Here is the 5th version of hugepage migration patchset.
> Changes in this version are as follows:
> - removed putback_active_hugepages() as a cleanup (1/9)
> - added code to check movability of a given hugepage (8/9)
> - set GFP MOVA
Here is the 5th version of hugepage migration patchset.
Changes in this version are as follows:
- removed putback_active_hugepages() as a cleanup (1/9)
- added code to check movability of a given hugepage (8/9)
- set GFP MOVABLE flag depending on the movability of hugepage (9/9).
I feel that 8/
5 matches
Mail list logo