On Thursday, January 3, 2019 9:58:28 PM IST Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:error: recursive dependency detected!
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:choice contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:200:symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM
> >>>
arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:error: recursive dependency detected!
arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:choice contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
arch/ia64/Kconfig:200:symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM
kernel/power/Kconfig:144:symbol PM is selected by PM_SLEEP
kernel/power/Kconfig:104:symbol
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 1:34 PM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:10:35PM +, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> > After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> > CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> > satisfied implicitly through
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:10:35PM +, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> specified directly. This
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:08 AM Chandan Rajendra wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 5:20:27 AM IST Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >
> > On 1/2/19 4:58 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This is pointing to a kconfig
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 5:20:27 AM IST Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> On 1/2/19 4:58 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch.
> >>>
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive
+Tony
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/2/19 4:58 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch.
> >>>
> >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive
On 1/2/19 4:58 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch.
arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive dependency detected!
arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:choice contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:50 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
>
>
> > This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch.
> >
> > arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive dependency detected!
> > arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:choice contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
> > arch/ia64/Kconfig:202:symbol
This is pointing to a kconfig issue on ia64 arch.
arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:error: recursive dependency detected!
arch/ia64/Kconfig:128:choice contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM
arch/ia64/Kconfig:202:symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM
IA64_HP_SIM is both a choice and is selected.
I did
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:33 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
>
> I have three opens with this ACPI/PCI change
>
> 1. the baseline change fails on my cross-compilation checks, see below
> the result of the attached script (simplification of the one I use to
> avoid 0day reports).
>
This is pointing
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:33 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
wrote:
>
> I have three opens with this ACPI/PCI change
>
> 1. the baseline change fails on my cross-compilation checks, see below
> the result of the attached script (simplification of the one I use to
> avoid 0day reports).
What baseline
I have three opens with this ACPI/PCI change
1. the baseline change fails on my cross-compilation checks, see below
the result of the attached script (simplification of the one I use to
avoid 0day reports).
2. there are different patterns to express the dependency on PCI e.g.
config
After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
specified directly. This code relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends
on PCI. For this reason,
14 matches
Mail list logo
