Also add my
Reviewed-by: George Spelvin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Sun, Feb 22 2015, Yury Norov wrote:
> New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat)
> and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text.
> It also shows better performance.
>
> find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
>
Hm, sorry, I should probably have
On Sun, Feb 22 2015, Yury Norov yury.no...@gmail.com wrote:
New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat)
and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text.
It also shows better performance.
find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
Hm, sorry, I should
Also add my
Reviewed-by: George Spelvin li...@horizon.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat)
and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text.
It also shows better performance.
find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov
---
include/linux/bitops.h | 4 +-
lib/find_last_bit.c|
New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat)
and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text.
It also shows better performance.
find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov yury.no...@gmail.com
---
include/linux/bitops.h | 4 +-
6 matches
Mail list logo
