Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Please, have a look at
> http://git.linuxtv.org/gliakhovetski/v4l-dvb.git/log/?h=for-4.6-2
> If all is good there, no need for a v6
Thanks for fixing the *_dma_irq() mess, and sorry for that.
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Please, have a look at
> http://git.linuxtv.org/gliakhovetski/v4l-dvb.git/log/?h=for-4.6-2
> If all is good there, no need for a v6
Thanks for fixing the *_dma_irq() mess, and sorry for that.
And I just tested your
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>> Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to
>> go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I
>> can
>> repost a v6 which solves it.
>
> How did you test it with that patchg #3??
I
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>> Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to
>> go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I
>> can
>> repost a v6 which solves it.
>
> How did you test it with that patchg #3??
I rebased my patches on
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >
> >> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi Robert,
> >> >
> >> > Didn't you tell me, that your
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >
> >> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi Robert,
> >> >
> >> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
>
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>
> >> Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to
> >> go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I
> >> can
> >> repost a v6 which
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>
> >> Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to
> >> go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I
> >> can
> >> repost a v6 which solves it.
> >
> > How did
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>>
>> > Hi Robert,
>> >
>> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
>> > these your patches were on hold?
>> They were reverted, and
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>>
>> > Hi Robert,
>> >
>> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
>> > these your
Hi Robert,
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
> > these your patches were on hold?
> They were reverted, and then revamped into DMA_CTRL_REUSE, upstreamed
Hi Robert,
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
> > these your patches were on hold?
> They were reverted, and then revamped into
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
> these your patches were on hold?
They were reverted, and then revamped into DMA_CTRL_REUSE, upstreamed and
merged, as in the commit 272420214d26 ("dmaengine: Add
Hi Robert,
Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
these your patches were on hold?
Thanks
Guennadi
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>
> > Fix the error path where the video buffer wasn't allocated nor
> > mapped. In this
Hi Robert,
Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
these your patches were on hold?
Thanks
Guennadi
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>
> > Fix the error path where the video buffer wasn't allocated
Guennadi Liakhovetski writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
> these your patches were on hold?
They were reverted, and then revamped into DMA_CTRL_REUSE, upstreamed and
merged, as in the commit 272420214d26
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> Fix the error path where the video buffer wasn't allocated nor
> mapped. In this case, in the driver free path don't try to unmap memory
> which was not mapped in the first place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
> ---
> Since v3: take into account the 2 paths
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> Fix the error path where the video buffer wasn't allocated nor
> mapped. In this case, in the driver free path don't try to unmap memory
> which was not mapped in the first place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
> ---
>
Fix the error path where the video buffer wasn't allocated nor
mapped. In this case, in the driver free path don't try to unmap memory
which was not mapped in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
---
Since v3: take into account the 2 paths possibilities to free_buffer()
---
Fix the error path where the video buffer wasn't allocated nor
mapped. In this case, in the driver free path don't try to unmap memory
which was not mapped in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik
---
Since v3: take into account the 2 paths possibilities to
20 matches
Mail list logo