On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 5:21 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/23 03:50, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:23 PM Maxime Coquelin
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jason,
> >>
> >> On 12/13/23 05:52, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:17 PM Maxime Coquelin
> >>> wrote:
On 12/18/23 03:50, Jason Wang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:23 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 12/13/23 05:52, Jason Wang wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:17 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
Virtio-net driver control queue implementation is not safe
when used with VDUSE. If the VDUS
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:23 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 12/13/23 05:52, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:17 PM Maxime Coquelin
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Virtio-net driver control queue implementation is not safe
> >> when used with VDUSE. If the VDUSE application doe
Hi Jason,
On 12/13/23 05:52, Jason Wang wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:17 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
Virtio-net driver control queue implementation is not safe
when used with VDUSE. If the VDUSE application does not
reply to control queue messages, it currently ends up
hanging the kernel thr
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:17 PM Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
>
> Virtio-net driver control queue implementation is not safe
> when used with VDUSE. If the VDUSE application does not
> reply to control queue messages, it currently ends up
> hanging the kernel thread sending this command.
>
> Some work is
Virtio-net driver control queue implementation is not safe
when used with VDUSE. If the VDUSE application does not
reply to control queue messages, it currently ends up
hanging the kernel thread sending this command.
Some work is on-going to make the control queue
implementation robust with VDUSE.
6 matches
Mail list logo