On 05/06/2013 05:08 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Do you mean to move the rq->avg and task_group->load_avg into CONFIG_SMP?
> More generally: Why do we need them in !CONFIG_SMP?
>
> [ I was suggesting (potentially) using only rq->avg in the !CONFIG_SMP case. ]
>
>
Paul,
here is the
Hi Paul,
On 05/06/2013 02:38 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar
On 05/06/2013 05:08 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>> The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
>>> but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
>> but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
>> like rq->avg, task_group->load_avg.
>> So move them
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
> but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
> like rq->avg, task_group->load_avg.
> So move them out, they also can work with UP.
Is there a
On 05/06/2013 12:11 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> You might want to do the below for struct sched_entity also?
> AFAIK,struct sched_entity has struct sched_avg under CONFIG_SMP.
>
Ops, why it passed my UP config building? Anyway will check and test more.
Thanks Preeti!
--
Thanks
Hi Alex,
You might want to do the below for struct sched_entity also?
AFAIK,struct sched_entity has struct sched_avg under CONFIG_SMP.
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
On 05/06/2013 07:15 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
> but similar runnable
On 05/06/2013 05:08 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
Hi Paul,
On 05/06/2013 02:38 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct
On 05/06/2013 05:08 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
Do you mean to move the rq-avg and task_group-load_avg into CONFIG_SMP?
More generally: Why do we need them in !CONFIG_SMP?
[ I was suggesting (potentially) using only rq-avg in the !CONFIG_SMP case. ]
Paul,
here is the patch according to
Hi Alex,
You might want to do the below for struct sched_entity also?
AFAIK,struct sched_entity has struct sched_avg under CONFIG_SMP.
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
On 05/06/2013 07:15 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable
On 05/06/2013 12:11 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alex,
You might want to do the below for struct sched_entity also?
AFAIK,struct sched_entity has struct sched_avg under CONFIG_SMP.
Ops, why it passed my UP config building? Anyway will check and test more.
Thanks Preeti!
--
Thanks
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
like rq-avg, task_group-load_avg.
So move them out, they also can work with UP.
Is
On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
like rq-avg, task_group-load_avg.
So
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable variables work for UP in
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
like rq->avg, task_group->load_avg.
So move them out, they also can work with UP.
u64 runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg;
atomic64_t
The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
like rq-avg, task_group-load_avg.
So move them out, they also can work with UP.
u64 runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg;
atomic64_t
18 matches
Mail list logo
