On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:24:15PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Borislav,
>
> Please note that this patch has changed slightly since you Acked it. I
> have moved the location of the negative-size array code to the end of
> the macro. I don't think this really matters honestly, but I figured
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:24:15PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote:
Borislav,
Please note that this patch has changed slightly since you Acked it. I
have moved the location of the negative-size array code to the end of
the macro. I don't think this really matters honestly, but I figured
this
Borislav,
Please note that this patch has changed slightly since you Acked it. I
have moved the location of the negative-size array code to the end of
the macro. I don't think this really matters honestly, but I figured
this was the best place to put that change.
Daniel
On 11/13/2012 04:13
Negative sized arrays wont create a compile-time error in some cases
starting with gcc 4.4 (e.g., inlined functions), but gcc 4.3 introduced
the error function attribute that will. This patch modifies
BUILD_BUG_ON to behave like BUILD_BUG already does, using the error
function attribute so that
Negative sized arrays wont create a compile-time error in some cases
starting with gcc 4.4 (e.g., inlined functions), but gcc 4.3 introduced
the error function attribute that will. This patch modifies
BUILD_BUG_ON to behave like BUILD_BUG already does, using the error
function attribute so that
Borislav,
Please note that this patch has changed slightly since you Acked it. I
have moved the location of the negative-size array code to the end of
the macro. I don't think this really matters honestly, but I figured
this was the best place to put that change.
Daniel
On 11/13/2012 04:13
6 matches
Mail list logo
