On Friday 29 November 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 November 2013, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> >> +static void __iomem *moxart_gpio_base;
> >
> > Just one comment: the usual way to do such a driver is to have
> > a derived data stru
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 November 2013, Jonas Jensen wrote:
>> +static void __iomem *moxart_gpio_base;
>
> Just one comment: the usual way to do such a driver is to have
> a derived data structure like
>
> struct moxart_gpio_chip {
> struct gpi
On Thursday 28 November 2013, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> +static void __iomem *moxart_gpio_base;
Just one comment: the usual way to do such a driver is to have
a derived data structure like
struct moxart_gpio_chip {
struct gpio_chip chip;
void __iomem *moxart_gpio_base;
};
and dynamic
Add GPIO driver for MOXA ART SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Jensen
---
Notes:
Thanks for reviewing!
v5 writes to "pincontrol" are not needed, the pins work regardless.
I took notes probing the pins with a multimeter, and I don't know the proper
place for it, so I'm attachin
4 matches
Mail list logo