Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Santos
On 10/01/2012 03:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500 > Daniel Santos wrote: > >> I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an >> updated patch set. Just tell me what works please. > I dropped everything - let's start again. I would have

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Santos
On 10/01/2012 03:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500 Daniel Santos danielfsan...@att.net wrote: I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an updated patch set. Just tell me what works please. I dropped everything - let's start again. I

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Santos
Andrew, I'm really sorry for the debacle of this round of patches. It turns out that my patches weren't reaching LKML because my recipient list was too large and the server was tagging it as spam, so none of these patches you committed ever made it to LKML. :( To fix that, I broke the 25

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500 Daniel Santos wrote: > I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an > updated patch set. Just tell me what works please. I dropped everything - let's start again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:54:16 -0500 Daniel Santos wrote: > This patch set improves on Andrea Arcangeli's original Red-Black Tree > implementation by adding generic search and insert functions with > complete support for: I grabbed patches 1-7, but I don't expect to send them in for 3.7. It's

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:54:16 -0500 Daniel Santos daniel.san...@pobox.com wrote: This patch set improves on Andrea Arcangeli's original Red-Black Tree implementation by adding generic search and insert functions with complete support for: I grabbed patches 1-7, but I don't expect to send them

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500 Daniel Santos danielfsan...@att.net wrote: I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an updated patch set. Just tell me what works please. I dropped everything - let's start again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Santos
Andrew, I'm really sorry for the debacle of this round of patches. It turns out that my patches weren't reaching LKML because my recipient list was too large and the server was tagging it as spam, so none of these patches you committed ever made it to LKML. :( To fix that, I broke the 25

[PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-09-27 Thread Daniel Santos
This revised patch set is rebased onto linux-mmotm. I have a new mail provider now, but they seem just as bad as the last, so I'm going to try to split the recpients in half and pray that this goes through. I'm sorry to those of you who have gotten partial patch sets and I hope to get this

[PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-09-27 Thread Daniel Santos
This revised patch set is rebased onto linux-mmotm. I have a new mail provider now, but they seem just as bad as the last, so I'm going to try to split the recpients in half and pray that this goes through. I'm sorry to those of you who have gotten partial patch sets and I hope to get this