> > ; yongmyung lee
> > ; Jinyoung CHOI > young.c...@samsung.com>; Adel Choi ; BoRam
> > Shin
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Western Digital. Do n
On Wed 2020-07-22 07:39:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As this monster seesm to come back again and again let me re-iterate
> my statement:
>
> I do not think Linux should support a broken standards extensions that
> creates a huge share state between the Linux initator and the target
> device
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 18:34 +, Avi Shchislowski wrote:
> Hello All,
> My name is Avi Shchislowski, I am managing the WDC's Linux Host R
> team in which Avri is a member of.
> As the review process of HPB is progressing very constructively, we
> are getting more and more requests from OEMs,
On 2020-07-22 06:27, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> As this monster seems to come back again and again let me re-iterate
>> my statement:
>>
>> I do not think Linux should support a broken standards extensions that
>> creates a huge share state between the Linux initiator
Christoph,
> As this monster seesm to come back again and again let me re-iterate
> my statement:
>
> I do not think Linux should support a broken standards extensions that
> creates a huge share state between the Linux initator and the target
> device like this with all its associated
As this monster seesm to come back again and again let me re-iterate
my statement:
I do not think Linux should support a broken standards extensions that
creates a huge share state between the Linux initator and the target
device like this with all its associated problems.
Nacked-by: Christoph
>
> Avri,
>
> > Martin - Can we move forward with this one?
>
> CHECK drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufsfeature.c:90:20: warning: symbol 'ufshpb_dev_type' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufsfeature.c:104:17: warning: symbol 'ufsf_bus_type'
Avri,
> Martin - Can we move forward with this one?
CHECK drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufsfeature.c:90:20: warning: symbol 'ufshpb_dev_type' was not
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufsfeature.c:104:17: warning: symbol 'ufsf_bus_type' was not
declared.
t; bvanass...@acm.org; tomas.wink...@intel.com
> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Sang-yoon Oh'
> ; 'Sung-Jun Park'
> ; 'yongmyung lee'
> ; 'Jinyoung CHOI' young.c...@samsung.com>; 'Adel Choi' ; 'BoRam
> Shin'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/5] scsi:
Martin - Can we move forward with this one?
Thanks,
Avri
>
> > > v5 -> v6
> > > Change base commit to b53293fa662e28ae0cdd40828dc641c09f133405
> > >
> > If no further comments, can this series have your Reviewed-by or Acked-by
> > tag, so that this can be taken for 5.9?
> > Thanks!
> Hey, yes.
ng.com>; 'Adel Choi' ; 'BoRam
> Shin'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Western Digital. Do not click
> on
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the s
> > v5 -> v6
> > Change base commit to b53293fa662e28ae0cdd40828dc641c09f133405
> >
> If no further comments, can this series have your Reviewed-by or Acked-by
> tag, so that this can be taken for 5.9?
> Thanks!
Hey, yes. So sorry for this delay, I was away for few days.
Yes - This series looks
y@mediatek.com; c...@codeaurora.org;
> tomas.wink...@intel.com; ALIM AKHTAR
> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sang-yoon Oh
> ; Sung-Jun Park
> ; yongmyung lee
> ; Jinyoung CHOI ;
> Adel Choi ; BoRam Shin
>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/5] sc
series that has already been
> > posted?
> > Although I'm not sure of this, I think that the SCSI maintainer expects more
> > Reviewed-by: and Tested-by: tags. Has anyone from WDC already taken the
> > time to review and/or test this patch series?
> >
> >
>
> Hi Avi,
>
> Are you perhaps referring to the HPB patch series that has already been
> posted?
> Although I'm not sure of this, I think that the SCSI maintainer expects more
> Reviewed-by: and Tested-by: tags. Has anyone from WDC already taken the
> time to review and/or
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 18:34 +, Avi Shchislowski wrote:
> Hello All,
> My name is Avi Shchislowski, I am managing the WDC's Linux Host R
> team in which Avri is a member of.
> As the review process of HPB is progressing very constructively, we
> are getting more and more requests from OEMs,
On 2020-07-15 11:34, Avi Shchislowski wrote:
> My name is Avi Shchislowski, I am managing the WDC's Linux Host R team in
> which Avri is a member of.
> As the review process of HPB is progressing very constructively, we are
> getting more and more requests from OEMs, Inquiring about HPB in
.org;
> tomas.wink...@intel.com; ALIM AKHTAR ; Daejun
> Park
> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sang-yoon Oh
> ; Sung-Jun Park
> ; yongmyung lee
> ; Jinyoung CHOI ;
> Adel Choi ; BoRam Shin
>
> Subject: [PATCH v6 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance
Oh
; Sung-Jun Park ;
yongmyung lee ; Jinyoung CHOI
; Adel Choi ; BoRam Shin
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Western Digital. Do not click on
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
Changelog:
v5 -> v6
Change base commit to b53293fa662e28ae0cdd40828dc641c09f133405
v4 -> v5
Delete unused macro define.
v3 -> v4
1. Cleanup.
v2 -> v3
1. Add checking input module parameter value.
2. Change base commit from 5.8/scsi-queue to 5.9/scsi-queue.
3. Cleanup for unused variables and
20 matches
Mail list logo
