Re: [PATCH v6 02/57] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq()

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:44 AM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2019-08-04 20:35:05) > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:16 AM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > > > > Please apply directly to subsystem trees > > > > I didn't follow this series. Is this for -fixes or -next? > > > > It's for -

Re: [PATCH v6 02/57] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq()

Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2019-08-04 20:35:05) > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:16 AM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > Please apply directly to subsystem trees > > I didn't follow this series. Is this for -fixes or -next? > It's for -next. Sorry for not including a link to the patch that introduces the p

Re: [PATCH v6 02/57] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq()

Hi, On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:16 AM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > We don't need dev_err() messages when platform_get_irq() fails now that > platform_get_irq() prints an error message itself when something goes > wrong. Let's remove these prints with a simple semantic patch. > > // > @@ > expression re

[PATCH v6 02/57] bus: sunxi-rsb: Remove dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq()

We don't need dev_err() messages when platform_get_irq() fails now that platform_get_irq() prints an error message itself when something goes wrong. Let's remove these prints with a simple semantic patch. // @@ expression ret; struct platform_device *E; @@ ret = ( platform_get_irq(E, ...) | plat