Hi Frank,
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 15:52:45 schrieb Frank Wang:
> On 2016/6/20 12:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Frank Wang
wrote:
> >>> Turns out my problem was one of terminology. Using "suspend" and
> >>> "resume" to me suggested the common use of suspend and
Hi Heiko,
On 2016/6/21 17:05, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Frank,
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 15:52:45 schrieb Frank Wang:
On 2016/6/20 12:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Frank Wang
wrote:
Turns out my problem was one of terminology. Using "suspend" and
"resume" to me
Hi Heiko,
On 2016/6/20 12:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
Hi Heiko & Guenter,
On 2016/6/20 11:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Frank Wang
wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 21:20, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Frank
Hi Frank,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
> Hi Heiko & Guenter,
>
>
> On 2016/6/20 11:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Frank Wang
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Guenter,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2016/6/17 21:20, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Frank,
On
Hi Heiko & Guenter,
On 2016/6/20 11:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 21:20, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Frank,
On 06/16/2016 11:43 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 12:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/16/2016 07:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
>
> On 2016/6/17 21:20, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 06/16/2016 11:43 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Guenter,
>>>
>>> On 2016/6/17 12:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/16/2016 07:09 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
>
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 21:20, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Frank,
On 06/16/2016 11:43 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 12:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/16/2016 07:09 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
than rk3288 and before, a
Hi Frank,
On 06/16/2016 11:43 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 12:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/16/2016 07:09 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
different fro
Hi Guenter,
On 2016/6/17 12:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 06/16/2016 07:09 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessaril
On 06/16/2016 07:09 PM, Frank Wang wrote:
The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessarily.
Signed-off-by: Frank Wang
Suggested-by: Guenter Ro
The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessarily.
Signed-off-by: Frank Wang
Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck
Suggested-by: Doug Anderson
Reviewed-b
11 matches
Mail list logo
