On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:52 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 27/06/2019 01.16, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:18 PM Nick Desaulniers
> > wrote:
> >
> > The prints should show up in dmesg right, assuming you do something to
> > trigger them? Can you provide more details
On 27/06/2019 01.16, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:18 PM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
>
> The prints should show up in dmesg right, assuming you do something to
> trigger them? Can you provide more details for a test case that's
> easy to trip? What's an easy case to
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:18 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
> 2. pci_pm_suspend_noirq seems to exist twice(?) before your patches, once
> after
> 3. xhci_urb_enqueue seems to exist three times before your patches, twice
> after
PEBKAC, I advanced my master branch without rebasing my local branch
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:35 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 24/06/2019 23.53, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:46 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> > wrote:
> >> Well, apart from booting, I've mostly just tested that the debugfs
> >> control file is identical before and after
On 24/06/2019 23.53, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:46 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> I've pushed them to https://github.com/Villemoes/linux/tree/dyndebug_v6
>> . They rebase pretty cleanly to just about anything you might prefer
>> testing on. Enabling it for arm64 or
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:46 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 18/06/2019 00.35, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:20 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It relies on
> >>
> >> (1) standard assembly directives that should work on
> >> all architectures
> >> (2) the "i"
On 18/06/2019 00.35, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:20 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> It relies on
>>
>> (1) standard assembly directives that should work on
>> all architectures
>> (2) the "i" constraint for an constant, and
>> (3) %cN emitting the constant operand N
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:20 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> A 64 bit architecture can allow reducing the size of the kernel image by
> selecting HAVE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS, but it must provide
> a proper DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA macro for emitting the struct
> _ddebug in assembly.
A 64 bit architecture can allow reducing the size of the kernel image by
selecting HAVE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS, but it must provide
a proper DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA macro for emitting the struct
_ddebug in assembly. However, since that does not involve any
instructions, this generic
9 matches
Mail list logo