On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:30 PM Kalle Valo wrote:
> New warning:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c: In function
> 'rtl8xxxu_refresh_rate_mask':
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:5907:7: warning: this
> statement may fall through
Chris Chiu wrote:
> We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
> The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
> They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
> iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server) gets ~1Mbps.
>
On 9/17/19 3:40 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
> We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
> The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
> They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
> iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server)
We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server) gets ~1Mbps.
Nevertheless, the signal strength is
Chris Chiu writes:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 PM Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 8/12/19 10:32 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen
>> >
>> > This is marked as RFC so I'm not sure what's the plan. Should I apply
>> > this?
>>
>> I think it's at a point where it's worth
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 PM Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 8/12/19 10:32 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen
> >
> > This is marked as RFC so I'm not sure what's the plan. Should I apply
> > this?
>
> I think it's at a point where it's worth applying - I kinda wish I had
>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 PM Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 8/12/19 10:32 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > This is marked as RFC so I'm not sure what's the plan. Should I apply
> > this?
>
> I think it's at a point where it's worth applying - I kinda wish I had
> had time to test it, but I won't be near
On 8/12/19 10:32 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jes Sorensen writes:
>> Looks good to me! Nice work! I am actually very curious if this will
>> improve performance 8192eu as well.
>>
>> Ideally I'd like to figure out how to make host controlled rates work,
>> but in all my experiments with that, I never
Jes Sorensen writes:
> On 8/5/19 9:14 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
>> We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
>> The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
>> They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
>> iperf (as a client to an
On 8/5/19 9:14 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
> We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
> The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
> They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
> iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server) gets
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:15 PM Chris Chiu wrote:
>
> We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
> The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
> They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
> iperf (as a client to an
We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server) gets ~1Mbps.
Nevertheless, the signal strength is
12 matches
Mail list logo
