From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:19:42 +0200
> Thanks for the quick answer.
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
>> patches at one time.
>>
>> Split your series up into logical, and more
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answer.
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
>> patches at one time.
>>
>> Split your series up into logical, and more
Thanks for the quick answer.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
> It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
> patches at one time.
>
> Split your series up into logical, and more reasonably sized chunks.
>
> I'd say 14 or 15 at a time is the limit.
It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
patches at one time.
Split your series up into logical, and more reasonably sized chunks.
I'd say 14 or 15 at a time is the limit.
I'm not even looking at this series until you submit it more reasonably.
Thank you.
--
To
This picks up the patch series where David Herrmann left off, incorporating
the feedback from David Miller.
Overview (see Patch 1 for more details):
Patch 1: Introduce the enums, documentation and userspace API
Patch 2: Hook up with device renaming
Patch 3: change the alloc_netdev*() API to take
This picks up the patch series where David Herrmann left off, incorporating
the feedback from David Miller.
Overview (see Patch 1 for more details):
Patch 1: Introduce the enums, documentation and userspace API
Patch 2: Hook up with device renaming
Patch 3: change the alloc_netdev*() API to take
It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
patches at one time.
Split your series up into logical, and more reasonably sized chunks.
I'd say 14 or 15 at a time is the limit.
I'm not even looking at this series until you submit it more reasonably.
Thank you.
--
To
Thanks for the quick answer.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
patches at one time.
Split your series up into logical, and more reasonably sized chunks.
I'd say 14 or 15 at a time
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
patches at one time.
Split your series up into
From: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:19:42 +0200
Thanks for the quick answer.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
It is not reasonable to expect people to review such a large number of
patches at one time.
Split your series up
10 matches
Mail list logo
