On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:15:25 +0100
Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> > So far as I know that HF is provided by Cypress only and
> >> > any mass production product use the component which is provided by only
> >> > one provider
> >> > will be a big risk.
> >> >
> >> > Compare to HF, there are more provider
eert Uytterhoeven"
>> , "Simon Horman" ,
>> julie...@mxic.com.tw, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-
>> s...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org,
>> sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com, zhengxu...@mxic.com.tw
>>
>> Subject
>>
>> R
On 1/29/19 3:26 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
>> >> "Marek Vasut"
>> >> >> >> > +module_platform_driver(rpc_spi_driver);
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> RPC is not a SPI controller, it's a SPI and HF controller.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Also, how difficult will it be to add the HF
On 1/28/19 2:38 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
>> "Marek Vasut"
>> >> >> > +module_platform_driver(rpc_spi_driver);
>> >> >>
>> >> >> RPC is not a SPI controller, it's a SPI and HF controller.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, how difficult will it be to add the HF support ?
>> >> >
On 1/24/19 7:28 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
>> "Marek Vasut"
>> 2019/01/24 上午 11:14
>> >>
>> >> > +module_platform_driver(rpc_spi_driver);
>> >>
>> >> RPC is not a SPI controller, it's a SPI and HF controller.
>> >>
>> >> Also, how difficult will it be to add the HF
On 01/24/2019 05:23 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > +module_platform_driver(rpc_spi_driver);
>>
>> RPC is not a SPI controller, it's a SPI and HF controller.
>>
>> Also, how difficult will it be to add the HF support ?
>
> One of my customers needs RPC SPI driver for our
On 01/24/2019 05:06 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
>> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > +//
>> > +// Copyright (C) 2018 ~ 2019 Renesas Solutions Corp.
>> > +// Copyright (C) 2018 Macronix International Co., Ltd.
>> > +//
>> > +// R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI/QSPI/Octa driver
>>
>>Do we
On 01/24/2019 05:06 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
>> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > +//
>> > +// Copyright (C) 2018 ~ 2019 Renesas Solutions Corp.
>> > +// Copyright (C) 2018 Macronix International Co., Ltd.
>> > +//
>> > +// R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI/QSPI/Octa driver
>>
>>Do we
Hi Mason,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:07 AM wrote:
> > "Sergei Shtylyov"
> > 2019/01/24 上午 02:04
> > > +static const struct of_device_id rpc_spi_of_ids[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "renesas,r8a77995-rpc", },
> >
> >Why (if it has no differences with the generic gen3 value below)?
> >
On 1/24/19 3:23 AM, masonccy...@mxic.com.tw wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
>> "Marek Vasut"
>> 2019/01/24 上午 09:54
>>
>>
>> > +#define RPC_CMNCR 0x // R/W
>>
>> Is there any reason for using those horrible C++ comments ?
>
> By Mark's comments for the SPDX header needs to be C++ style and
>
On 1/23/19 8:09 AM, Mason Yang wrote:
> Add a driver for Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mason Yang
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov
[...]
> +#define RPC_CMNCR0x // R/W
Is there any reason for using those horrible C++ comments ?
[...]
>
Hello!
On 01/23/2019 10:09 AM, Mason Yang wrote:
> Add a driver for Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mason Yang
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-renesas-rpc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-renesas-rpc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index
Add a driver for Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller.
Signed-off-by: Mason Yang
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov
---
drivers/spi/Kconfig | 6 +
drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/spi/spi-renesas-rpc.c | 805 ++
3 files changed,
13 matches
Mail list logo
