On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:24:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It really helps if we can get the earlier parts of the series moving
> > even if the rest of it's in review still - I know I back off on
> > reviewing things if it looks like their dependencies
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:24:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It really helps if we can get the earlier parts of the series moving
> > even if the rest of it's in review still - I know I back off on
> > reviewing things if it looks like their dependencies
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been
> > reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the
>
> I've been fine with them for ages.
>
> > other
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been
> > reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the
>
> I've been fine with them for ages.
>
> > other
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> However, since this is a new driver, you can just take it with my:
The following changes since commit 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e:
Linux 4.14-rc1 (2017-09-16 15:47:51 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> However, since this is a new driver, you can just take it with my:
The following changes since commit 2bd6bf03f4c1c59381d62c61d03f6cc3fe71f66e:
Linux 4.14-rc1 (2017-09-16 15:47:51 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been
> reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the
I've been fine with them for ages.
> other affected Maintainers how they want to deal with the patch.
>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been
> reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the
I've been fine with them for ages.
> other affected Maintainers how they want to deal with the patch.
>
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > > Change of plan. It
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > > Change of plan. It
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
>
> > > > Unapplied.
>
> >
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
>
> > > > Unapplied.
>
> >
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
> > > Unapplied.
> > The core stuff went in during the merge window, you
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
> > > Unapplied.
> > The core stuff went in during the merge window, you
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
>
> > Unapplied.
>
> The core stuff went in during the merge window, you should be able to
> wait for -rc1 or pick up the asoc-v4.14 tag.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
>
> > Unapplied.
>
> The core stuff went in during the merge window, you should be able to
> wait for -rc1 or pick up the asoc-v4.14 tag.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
> Unapplied.
The core stuff went in during the merge window, you should be able to
wait for -rc1 or pick up the asoc-v4.14 tag.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Change of plan. It looks like there are deps.
> Unapplied.
The core stuff went in during the merge window, you should be able to
wait for -rc1 or pick up the asoc-v4.14 tag.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> > The WM9705, WM9712 and WM9713 are highly integrated codecs, with an
> > audio codec, DAC and ADC, GPIO unit and a touchscreen interface.
> >
> > Historically the support was spread across
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> > The WM9705, WM9712 and WM9713 are highly integrated codecs, with an
> > audio codec, DAC and ADC, GPIO unit and a touchscreen interface.
> >
> > Historically the support was spread across
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> The WM9705, WM9712 and WM9713 are highly integrated codecs, with an
> audio codec, DAC and ADC, GPIO unit and a touchscreen interface.
>
> Historically the support was spread across drivers/input/touchscreen and
> sound/soc/codecs. The sharing was
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> The WM9705, WM9712 and WM9713 are highly integrated codecs, with an
> audio codec, DAC and ADC, GPIO unit and a touchscreen interface.
>
> Historically the support was spread across drivers/input/touchscreen and
> sound/soc/codecs. The sharing was
The WM9705, WM9712 and WM9713 are highly integrated codecs, with an
audio codec, DAC and ADC, GPIO unit and a touchscreen interface.
Historically the support was spread across drivers/input/touchscreen and
sound/soc/codecs. The sharing was done through ac97 bus sharing. This
model will not
The WM9705, WM9712 and WM9713 are highly integrated codecs, with an
audio codec, DAC and ADC, GPIO unit and a touchscreen interface.
Historically the support was spread across drivers/input/touchscreen and
sound/soc/codecs. The sharing was done through ac97 bus sharing. This
model will not
24 matches
Mail list logo
