On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> > PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> >
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig| 19 +++-
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com
Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar tinam...@apm.com
---
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:26:02PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > I don't even understand why you want to create a generic
> > > pci_address_to_pio
> > > implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm
> > > missing something
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > I don't even understand why you want to create a generic pci_address_to_pio
> > implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm
> > missing something important, that function is only called in case of
> > PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE with
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:17:22AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My ultimate point is that no matter how
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >
> > > My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of
> > > the functions that
> > > I've added
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of
> > the functions that
> > I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of
the functions that
I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get away
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of
the functions that
I've added into
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:17:22AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
I don't even understand why you want to create a generic pci_address_to_pio
implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm
missing something important, that function is only called in case of
PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE with
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:26:02PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
I don't even understand why you want to create a generic
pci_address_to_pio
implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm
missing something important,
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of the
> functions that
> I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get away without
> having that
> file, or at least not in the first phase if we
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 12:53:11 Rob Herring wrote:
> I've successfully used the preceeding series on ARM converting the
> Versatile PCI support to use it. The main part of the process was just
> copying this arm64 code to arm which tells me the code is in the wrong
> place. There are still
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 14 March 2014,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 12:53:11 Rob Herring wrote:
I've successfully used the preceeding series on ARM converting the
Versatile PCI support to use it. The main part of the process was just
copying this arm64 code to arm which tells me the code is in the wrong
place. There are still some
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of the
functions that
I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get away without
having that
file, or at least not in the first phase if we want
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:05:38PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> > PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> > Tested-by:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig| 19 +++-
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com
Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar tinam...@apm.com
---
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:05:38PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 20:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > As for the other two functions, I've no special attachment to where they
> > are present
> > and I'm happy to move them into drivers/pci on the condition that the
> > patchset doesn't
> > double in size. The reason why I'm weary of
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 20:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
As for the other two functions, I've no special attachment to where they
are present
and I'm happy to move them into drivers/pci on the condition that the
patchset doesn't
double in size. The reason why I'm weary of touching other
On Friday 14 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
>
> I haven't seen any reaction from Bjorn on this, so I threaded carefully on
> that
> subject. I'm new to this so I don't know how to handle this.
>
> To my mind, and looking at the way every architecture has been setup, the
> pcibios_*
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > [...]
> > > +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address,
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> [...]
> > +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
> [...]
> > +unsigned long
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
[...]
> +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
[...]
> +unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
[...]
> +void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus
Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig| 19 +++-
arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h | 3
Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com
Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar tinam...@apm.com
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig| 19 +++-
arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
[...]
+int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
[...]
+unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
[...]
+void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
[...]
+int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
[...]
+unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
[...]
+int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address,
On Friday 14 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
I haven't seen any reaction from Bjorn on this, so I threaded carefully on
that
subject. I'm new to this so I don't know how to handle this.
To my mind, and looking at the way every architecture has been setup, the
pcibios_*
function are
44 matches
Mail list logo
