On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Ok, I have added PP1 now and it works fine on my HSW desktop.
> What I want to know now is what is this map to on servers?
> And on clients, it is always mapped to the GFX. If so, then
> we can use a more specific name: power/energy-gfx/
I don't
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Ok, I have added PP1 now and it works fine on my HSW desktop.
What I want to know now is what is this map to on servers?
And on clients, it is always mapped to the GFX. If so, then
we can use a more specific name: power/energy-gfx/
I don't know if
Vince,
Ok, I have added PP1 now and it works fine on my HSW desktop.
What I want to know now is what is this map to on servers?
And on clients, it is always mapped to the GFX. If so, then
we can use a more specific name: power/energy-gfx/
I will send a patch soon.
Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:09:46PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > So in theory it would be harmless to export the values even if not
> > supported. What is the worst failure mode? That somehow a recent CPU
> > doesn't support the MSR and we get a GPF when trying to access it?
> >
> Yes. I
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Vince Weaver wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >>
> >> > > So I notice PP1 (which is the
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
So I
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Wed, Nov
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:09:46PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
So in theory it would be harmless to export the values even if not
supported. What is the worst failure mode? That somehow a recent CPU
doesn't support the MSR and we get a GPF when trying to access it?
Yes. I think
Vince,
Ok, I have added PP1 now and it works fine on my HSW desktop.
What I want to know now is what is this map to on servers?
And on clients, it is always mapped to the GFX. If so, then
we can use a more specific name: power/energy-gfx/
I will send a patch soon.
Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Vince Weaver wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
>>
>> > > So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
>> > > is not supported.
>> > >
>>
* Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> > > So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
> > > is not supported.
> > >
> > > Is that just for simplicity?
> > >
> > Does it work on
* Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
is not supported.
Is that just for simplicity?
Does it
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
> > is not supported.
> >
> > Is that just for simplicity?
> >
> Does it work on specific models only? I bet so. How to detect
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> This patch adds a new uncore PMU to expose the Intel
>> RAPL energy consumption counters. Up to 3 counters,
>> each counting a particular RAPL event are exposed.
>>
>> The RAPL counters are
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch adds a new uncore PMU to expose the Intel
> RAPL energy consumption counters. Up to 3 counters,
> each counting a particular RAPL event are exposed.
>
> The RAPL counters are available on Intel SandyBridge,
> IvyBridge, Haswell. The
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:58:50PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Sampling is not supported by the RAPL PMU. There is no
> privilege level filtering either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian
> Signed-off-by: Maria Dimakopoulou
So the merge window closed and we're starting to merge new bits
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:58:50PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Sampling is not supported by the RAPL PMU. There is no
privilege level filtering either.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian eran...@google.com
Signed-off-by: Maria Dimakopoulou maria.n.dimakopou...@gmail.com
So the merge window
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
This patch adds a new uncore PMU to expose the Intel
RAPL energy consumption counters. Up to 3 counters,
each counting a particular RAPL event are exposed.
The RAPL counters are available on Intel SandyBridge,
IvyBridge, Haswell. The server skus
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
This patch adds a new uncore PMU to expose the Intel
RAPL energy consumption counters. Up to 3 counters,
each counting a particular RAPL event are exposed.
The RAPL counters
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver vi...@deater.net wrote:
So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
is not supported.
Is that just for simplicity?
Does it work on specific models only? I bet so. How to detect
This patch adds a new uncore PMU to expose the Intel
RAPL energy consumption counters. Up to 3 counters,
each counting a particular RAPL event are exposed.
The RAPL counters are available on Intel SandyBridge,
IvyBridge, Haswell. The server skus add a 3rd counter.
The following events are
This patch adds a new uncore PMU to expose the Intel
RAPL energy consumption counters. Up to 3 counters,
each counting a particular RAPL event are exposed.
The RAPL counters are available on Intel SandyBridge,
IvyBridge, Haswell. The server skus add a 3rd counter.
The following events are
24 matches
Mail list logo
