On 04-05-20, 14:01, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Fair enough. But don't "voltage corner" based devices NEED to use OPP
> framework to set their frequencies?
No. Anyone can call dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state().
--
viresh
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:00 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-04-20, 09:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > You are missing the point. This is not about aggregation. This is
> > about OPP voting for bandwidth on a path when the vote can/should be
> > 0.
> >
> > I'll give another example. Say one of the
On 2020-04-24 21:24, Georgi Djakov wrote:
If the OPP bandwidth values are populated, we want to switch also the
interconnect bandwidth in addition to frequency and voltage.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11527571/
Scaling from set_rate or using ^^
to set bw levels, I'm fine with
both.
Re
On 30-04-20, 09:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> You are missing the point. This is not about aggregation. This is
> about OPP voting for bandwidth on a path when the vote can/should be
> 0.
>
> I'll give another example. Say one of the interconnect paths needs to
> be voted only when a particular use
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:54 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-04-20, 00:35, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24-04-20, 14:18, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > My only comment is -- can we drop this patch please? I'd like to use
> >
On 30-04-20, 00:35, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 24-04-20, 14:18, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > My only comment is -- can we drop this patch please? I'd like to use
> > > devfreq governors for voting on bandwidth and this will effectively
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 24-04-20, 14:18, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > My only comment is -- can we drop this patch please? I'd like to use
> > devfreq governors for voting on bandwidth and this will effectively
> > override whatever bandwidth decisions are made by
On 24-04-20, 14:18, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> My only comment is -- can we drop this patch please? I'd like to use
> devfreq governors for voting on bandwidth and this will effectively
> override whatever bandwidth decisions are made by the devfreq
> governor.
And why would that be better ? FWIW, t
8 matches
Mail list logo