From: Vineeth Pillai <virem...@linux.microsoft.com>

If there is only one long running local task and the sibling is
forced idle, it  might not get a chance to run until a schedule
event happens on any cpu in the core.

So we check for this condition during a tick to see if a sibling
is starved and then give it a chance to schedule.

Tested-by: Julien Desfossez <jdesfos...@digitalocean.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpil...@digitalocean.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Desfossez <jdesfos...@digitalocean.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  | 15 ++++++++-------
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 12030b77bd6d..469428979182 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4710,16 +4710,15 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, 
struct rq_flags *rf)
 
        /* reset state */
        rq->core->core_cookie = 0UL;
+       if (rq->core->core_forceidle) {
+               need_sync = true;
+               rq->core->core_forceidle = false;
+       }
        for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
                struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
 
                rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
 
-               if (rq_i->core_forceidle) {
-                       need_sync = true;
-                       rq_i->core_forceidle = false;
-               }
-
                if (i != cpu)
                        update_rq_clock(rq_i);
        }
@@ -4839,8 +4838,10 @@ next_class:;
                if (!rq_i->core_pick)
                        continue;
 
-               if (is_task_rq_idle(rq_i->core_pick) && rq_i->nr_running)
-                       rq_i->core_forceidle = true;
+               if (is_task_rq_idle(rq_i->core_pick) && rq_i->nr_running &&
+                   !rq_i->core->core_forceidle) {
+                       rq_i->core->core_forceidle = true;
+               }
 
                if (i == cpu) {
                        rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 58f670e5704d..56bea0decda1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10652,6 +10652,44 @@ static void rq_offline_fair(struct rq *rq)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
+static inline bool
+__entity_slice_used(struct sched_entity *se, int min_nr_tasks)
+{
+       u64 slice = sched_slice(cfs_rq_of(se), se);
+       u64 rtime = se->sum_exec_runtime - se->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
+
+       return (rtime * min_nr_tasks > slice);
+}
+
+#define MIN_NR_TASKS_DURING_FORCEIDLE  2
+static inline void task_tick_core(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+       if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
+               return;
+
+       /*
+        * If runqueue has only one task which used up its slice and
+        * if the sibling is forced idle, then trigger schedule to
+        * give forced idle task a chance.
+        *
+        * sched_slice() considers only this active rq and it gets the
+        * whole slice. But during force idle, we have siblings acting
+        * like a single runqueue and hence we need to consider runnable
+        * tasks on this cpu and the forced idle cpu. Ideally, we should
+        * go through the forced idle rq, but that would be a perf hit.
+        * We can assume that the forced idle cpu has atleast
+        * MIN_NR_TASKS_DURING_FORCEIDLE - 1 tasks and use that to check
+        * if we need to give up the cpu.
+        */
+       if (rq->core->core_forceidle && rq->cfs.nr_running == 1 &&
+           __entity_slice_used(&curr->se, MIN_NR_TASKS_DURING_FORCEIDLE))
+               resched_curr(rq);
+}
+#else
+static inline void task_tick_core(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) {}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * scheduler tick hitting a task of our scheduling class.
  *
@@ -10675,6 +10713,8 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct 
task_struct *curr, int queued)
 
        update_misfit_status(curr, rq);
        update_overutilized_status(task_rq(curr));
+
+       task_tick_core(rq, curr);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 2b6e0bf61720..884d23d5e55d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1056,12 +1056,12 @@ struct rq {
        unsigned int            core_enabled;
        unsigned int            core_sched_seq;
        struct rb_root          core_tree;
-       unsigned char           core_forceidle;
 
        /* shared state */
        unsigned int            core_task_seq;
        unsigned int            core_pick_seq;
        unsigned long           core_cookie;
+       unsigned char           core_forceidle;
 #endif
 };
 
-- 
2.29.0.rc1.297.gfa9743e501-goog

Reply via email to