Re: [PATCH v8 12/22] counter: Rename counter_count_function to counter_function

2021-02-22 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:56:13AM -0600, David Lechner wrote: > On 2/14/21 11:13 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:13:36 +0900 > > William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > > >> The phrase "Counter Count function" is verbose and unintentionally > >> implies that function is a Count

Re: [PATCH v8 12/22] counter: Rename counter_count_function to counter_function

2021-02-20 Thread David Lechner
On 2/14/21 11:13 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:13:36 +0900 William Breathitt Gray wrote: The phrase "Counter Count function" is verbose and unintentionally implies that function is a Count extension. This patch adjusts the Counter subsystem code to use the more direct

Re: [PATCH v8 12/22] counter: Rename counter_count_function to counter_function

2021-02-14 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:13:36 +0900 William Breathitt Gray wrote: > The phrase "Counter Count function" is verbose and unintentionally > implies that function is a Count extension. This patch adjusts the > Counter subsystem code to use the more direct "Counter function" phrase > to make the

[PATCH v8 12/22] counter: Rename counter_count_function to counter_function

2021-02-12 Thread William Breathitt Gray
The phrase "Counter Count function" is verbose and unintentionally implies that function is a Count extension. This patch adjusts the Counter subsystem code to use the more direct "Counter function" phrase to make the intent of this code clearer. The phrase "Count action" is adjusted herein as