nel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" ,
> > "Frederic Weisbecker" ,
> > "Andrew Morton" , "Frank Ch. Eigler"
> > , "Johannes Berg"
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:54:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] Trace
es Berg"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:54:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct tracepoint
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:49:54 + (UTC)
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
>
> > So my current thinking is that the pre-existing
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:49:54 + (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> So my current thinking is that the pre-existing code was erroneously
> enabling tracepoints with the name of every event enabled (including
> e.g. function tracer, kprobes, etc). It was not failing because
> tracepoint.c silently
es Berg"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 1:15:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct tracepoint
>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 18:31:48 -0400
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > Register/unregister tracepoint probes with struct trace
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 18:31:48 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Register/unregister tracepoint probes with struct tracepoint pointer
> rather than tracepoint name.
>
> This change, which vastly simplifies tracepoint.c, has been proposed by
> Steven Rostedt. It also removes 8.8kB (mostly of text) t
Register/unregister tracepoint probes with struct tracepoint pointer
rather than tracepoint name.
This change, which vastly simplifies tracepoint.c, has been proposed by
Steven Rostedt. It also removes 8.8kB (mostly of text) to the vmlinux
size.
>From this point on, the tracers need to pass a str
6 matches
Mail list logo
