On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:59:55AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Ricardo Neri
> wrote:
> > fixup_umip_exception() will be called from do_general_protection(). If the
> > former returns false, the latter will issue a SIGSEGV
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:59:55AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Ricardo Neri
> wrote:
> > fixup_umip_exception() will be called from do_general_protection(). If the
> > former returns false, the latter will issue a SIGSEGV with SEND_SIG_PRIV.
> > However, when
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
> fixup_umip_exception() will be called from do_general_protection(). If the
> former returns false, the latter will issue a SIGSEGV with SEND_SIG_PRIV.
> However, when emulation is successful but the
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
> fixup_umip_exception() will be called from do_general_protection(). If the
> former returns false, the latter will issue a SIGSEGV with SEND_SIG_PRIV.
> However, when emulation is successful but the emulated result cannot be
> copied to user
fixup_umip_exception() will be called from do_general_protection(). If the
former returns false, the latter will issue a SIGSEGV with SEND_SIG_PRIV.
However, when emulation is successful but the emulated result cannot be
copied to user space memory, it is more accurate to issue a SIGSEGV with
fixup_umip_exception() will be called from do_general_protection(). If the
former returns false, the latter will issue a SIGSEGV with SEND_SIG_PRIV.
However, when emulation is successful but the emulated result cannot be
copied to user space memory, it is more accurate to issue a SIGSEGV with
6 matches
Mail list logo