Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

Hi Arnaldo, Could you please take a look at this? Thanks, Namhyung On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

Hi Arnaldo, Could you please take a look at this? Thanks, Namhyung On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

Hi Jiri, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:34:28PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > >

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

Hi Jiri, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:34:28PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > >

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy > these days,

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy > these days,

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

* Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy > these days, so I'm retrying

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

* Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy > these days, so I'm retrying it by myself. > > *

[PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

Hello, This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy these days, so I'm retrying it by myself. * changes in v2) - change name 'b/n

[PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

Hello, This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy these days, so I'm retrying it by myself. * changes in v2) - change name 'b/n