Re: [PATCHSET v6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL

2020-10-26 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, Oct 22 2020 at 20:22, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/16/20 9:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > Thomas, would be nice to know if you're good with patch 2+3 at this > point. Once we get outside of the merge window next week, I'll post > the updated series since we get a few conflicts at this point, and

Re: [PATCHSET v6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL

2020-10-22 Thread Jens Axboe
On 10/16/20 9:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > Hi, > > The goal is this patch series is to decouple TWA_SIGNAL based task_work > from real signals and signal delivery. The motivation is speeding up > TWA_SIGNAL based task_work, particularly for threaded setups where > ->sighand is shared across

[PATCHSET v6] Add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL

2020-10-16 Thread Jens Axboe
Hi, The goal is this patch series is to decouple TWA_SIGNAL based task_work from real signals and signal delivery. The motivation is speeding up TWA_SIGNAL based task_work, particularly for threaded setups where ->sighand is shared across threads. See the last patch for numbers. Cleanups in this