Re: [PATCHv2] bridge: separate querier and query timer into IGMP/IPv4 and MLD/IPv6 ones

2013-08-30 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Lüssing Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:28:17 +0200 > Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there > is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would > possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is > because we

[PATCHv2] bridge: separate querier and query timer into IGMP/IPv4 and MLD/IPv6 ones

2013-08-30 Thread Linus Lüssing
Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is because we are currently assuming that if either an IGMP or MLD querier is

[PATCHv2] bridge: separate querier and query timer into IGMP/IPv4 and MLD/IPv6 ones

2013-08-30 Thread Linus Lüssing
Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is because we are currently assuming that if either an IGMP or MLD querier is

Re: [PATCHv2] bridge: separate querier and query timer into IGMP/IPv4 and MLD/IPv6 ones

2013-08-30 Thread David Miller
From: Linus Lüssing linus.luess...@web.de Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:28:17 +0200 Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones.