On Sat, 2018-08-18 at 19:21 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 08/18/2018 07:15 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
> > > > 0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> > >
> > >Your description stopped to match the patch
On 08/18/2018 06:53 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
>> 0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
>Your description stopped to match the patch in v2.
And your subject as well...
>Actually, this X == NULL to
On 08/18/2018 07:15 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
>>> 0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>
>>Your description stopped to match the patch in v2.
>>Actually, this X == NULL to !x preference is largely spocif
On Sat, 2018-08-18 at 18:53 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 08/18/2018 09:16 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>
> > We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
> > 0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
>Your description stopped to match the patch in v2.
>
On 08/18/2018 09:16 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
> 0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Your description stopped to match the patch in v2.
Actually, this X == NULL to !x preference is largely spocific to netdev
We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
---
drivers/ide/pmac.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/pmac.c b/drivers/ide/pmac.c
index c5b902b..ca
6 matches
Mail list logo