Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] mdadm: setting device role of raid1 disk with failfast

Hi, Is nobody interested in those patches? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:51:55AM +0100, Gioh Kim wrote: > Hi, > > I've found a case that failfast option of mdadm set a disk faulty wrongly. > Following is my test case. > > mdadm --create /dev/md100 -l 1 --failfast -e 1.2 -n 2 /dev/vdb /dev/vdc >

Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] mdadm: setting device role of raid1 disk with failfast

Hi, Is nobody interested in those patches? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:51:55AM +0100, Gioh Kim wrote: > Hi, > > I've found a case that failfast option of mdadm set a disk faulty wrongly. > Following is my test case. > > mdadm --create /dev/md100 -l 1 --failfast -e 1.2 -n 2 /dev/vdb /dev/vdc >

[PATCHv2 0/2] mdadm: setting device role of raid1 disk with failfast

Hi, I've found a case that failfast option of mdadm set a disk faulty wrongly. Following is my test case. mdadm --create /dev/md100 -l 1 --failfast -e 1.2 -n 2 /dev/vdb /dev/vdc mdadm /dev/md100 -a --failfast /dev/vdd If I use failfast option, the vdd disk was faulty wrongly. If not, it was

[PATCHv2 0/2] mdadm: setting device role of raid1 disk with failfast

Hi, I've found a case that failfast option of mdadm set a disk faulty wrongly. Following is my test case. mdadm --create /dev/md100 -l 1 --failfast -e 1.2 -n 2 /dev/vdb /dev/vdc mdadm /dev/md100 -a --failfast /dev/vdd If I use failfast option, the vdd disk was faulty wrongly. If not, it was