On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:46:18PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/09/13 06:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > This is an updated version of the series I posted back in December:
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137929.html
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Drop
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:46:18PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 01/09/13 06:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
This is an updated version of the series I posted back in December:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137929.html
Changes since v1:
* Drop removal of
On 01/09/13 06:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> This is an updated version of the series I posted back in December:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137929.html
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Drop removal of guards in smp.c
> * Removed useless evt->evt_handler check in
This is an updated version of the series I posted back in December:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137929.html
Changes since v1:
* Drop removal of guards in smp.c
* Removed useless evt->evt_handler check in tick_receive_broadcast
* Fix up
This is an updated version of the series I posted back in December:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137929.html
Changes since v1:
* Drop removal of guards in smp.c
* Removed useless evt-evt_handler check in tick_receive_broadcast
* Fix up tick_receive_broadcast
On 01/09/13 06:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
This is an updated version of the series I posted back in December:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-December/137929.html
Changes since v1:
* Drop removal of guards in smp.c
* Removed useless evt-evt_handler check in
6 matches
Mail list logo